If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains ***.kastatic.org** and ***.kasandbox.org** are unblocked.

Main content

Current time:0:00Total duration:8:40

- [Instructor] Let's say that
we have the polynomial p of x. And when expressed in factored
form, it is x plus two times two x minus three times x minus four. What we're going to do in this
video is use our knowledge of the roots of this polynomial
to think about intervals where this polynomial would
be positive or negative. And the key realization
is, is that the sign of a polynomial stays the same
between consecutive zeros. Let me just draw an arbitrary
graph of a polynomial here to make you appreciate why that is true. So x-axis, y-axis. And if I were to draw some
arbitrary polynomial like that, you can see that between consecutive zeros the sign is the same. Between this zero and this zero,
the polynomial is positive. Between this zero and this zero,
the polynomial is negative. And that's almost intuitively true. Because if the sign did not stay the same, that means you would
have to cross the x-axis. So you would have a zero, but we're saying between
consecutive zeros. So between this zero and this
zero, it is positive again. Then after that zero, it stays negative. Once again, the only way it
wouldn't stay negative is if there were another zero. So now let's go back to this example here. And let me delete this
because this is not the graph of p of x, which I have just written down. Let's first think about its zeros. So the zeros are the x-values that would either make
x plus two equal zero, two x minus three equal zero,
or x minus four equal zero. So first, we can think about, well, what x-values would make x plus two, x plus two equal to zero? Well, that, of course, would
be x equals negative two. What x-values would make two
x minus three equal zero? Two x minus three equal to zero, add three to both sides,
you get two x equals three. Divide both sides by two,
you get x equals 3/2. And then last but not least,
what x-values would make x minus four equal to zero?
(distant siren wailing) Add four to both sides,
you get x is equal to four. And so if we were to plot this, it would look something like this. So this x equals negative two, (distant siren wailing)
x equals negative one. This is zero. This is one, two, three, and four. And let me draw the y-axis here. So the y-axis would look
something like this, x and y. We have a zero at x equals negative two, so our graph will
intersect the x-axis there. We have a zero at x is equal
to 3/2, which is 1 1/2, which is right over there. And we have a zero at x equals hour, which is right over there. And so we have several
candidate intervals. And actually, let me write
this down in a table. So the intervals over which and this is really, be between consecutive zeros, intervals to consider. So I'll draw a little table here. So you have x is less than negative two. That's one interval. X is less than, actually,
let me color-code this. So if I were to say the interval for x is less than negative two, so that's this yellow that I
draw at the extreme left there. We could have an interval where x is between negative two and 3/2, so negative two is less than
x, is less than positive 3/2. That would be this
interval right over here. You have the interval, I'm
trying to use all my colors, between 3/2 and four, this interval here. So that would be 3/2 is less
than x, is less than four. And then last but not least, you have the interval where
x is greater than four, that interval right over there. So x is greater, greater than four. Now, there's a couple of ways
of thinking about whether, over that interval, our function
is positive or negative. One method is to just evaluate our p, our function at a point in the interval. And if it's positive, well, that's means that that
whole interval is positive. It's negative, that means that that whole
interval is negative. And once again, it's intuitive because, if for whatever reason, it were to switch, we would have another zero. I know I keep saying that. But another way to think about it is, over that interval, what is
the behavior of x plus two, two x minus three, and x minus four? Think about whether they're
positive or negative, and use our knowledge
of multiplying positives and negatives together to
figure out whether we're dealing with a positive or negative. So let's do it, we could do it both ways. So let's think of this as our sample x, sample x-value. And then let's see what
we can intuit about or deduce about whether,
over that interval, we are positive or negative. So for x is less than negative two, maybe an easy one or
an obvious one to use, it could be any value where
x is less than negative two, but let's try x is
equal to negative three. So you could try to evaluate
p of negative three. You could just evaluate that. Actually, let's just do that. So that's going to be equal
to negative one times, two times negative three is negative six, minus three is negative nine, negative nine times
negative three minus four, that is negative seven. So if you were to
multiply all of this out, this would give you negative
63, which is clearly negative. So over this interval right over here, our polynomial is going to be negative. So then we can move on to the next one. An interesting thing
is we didn't even have to figure out the 63 part. We can just see that there's
a negative times a negative times a negative, which
is going to be a negative. And so let's just do that going forward. Let's just think about whether each of these are going to
be positive or negative and what would happen when you multiply those positive and negatives together. Now, in this second interval
between negative two and 3/2, what is going to happen? Well, we could do a sample point. Let's say x is equal to zero. That might be pretty straightforward. Well, when x is equal to zero, we're going to be dealing with a positive times a negative times a negative, a positive times a
negative times a negative. And the reason why I
did that is in my head. I said, okay, that's
going to be a positive two times a negative three
times a negative four. So a positive times a
negative times a negative, so I could write it this way. It's going to be a
positive times a negative times a negative. Well, a negative times a
negative is a positive, and a positive times a
positive is a positive. So we are positive over that interval. And if you were to evaluate p of zero, you will get a positive value. Now what about this next interval? What about this next interval
here between 3/2 and four? We could try x is equal to two. At when x is equal to two, we are going to get a positive times a positive times a, two minus four is
negative, times a negative. So this is going to be
negative over that interval. And then last but not least,
when x is greater than four, we could try x is equal to let's say five. We are going to have a positive, positive times a positive times a positive. So we are going to have a positive. And as I mentioned, you could also do it
without the sample points. You could say, okay, when
x is greater than four, you could say, okay, for
any x greater than four, if you add two to it, that for
sure is going to be positive. For any x greater than four, if you multiply it by
two and subtract three, well, that's still going to be positive 'cause two times something
greater than four is definitely greater than three. And for any x greater than four, if you subtract four from it, you're still going to
have a positive value. So that's another way to think about it, even if you don't use a sample point. But there you have it, we
figured out the intervals over which the function
is negative or positive. And we don't know exactly
what the function looks like, but generally speaking it's negative over this first interval. So it might look something like this. It's positive over that next interval. And then it's negative
over that third interval. And then it's positive
over that last interval. So we'd have a general shape like this. We don't know, without
trying out more points, exactly how high or low
it would actually go.