We should think about the appropriate level of precision of different measurements in modeling problems. Created by Sal Khan.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why are there so many different units to measure in math. Why can't we just use one?(2 votes)
- There's a good reason we can't. let's say we only stick to using metres. Now, how would you measure the distance between planets in metres? it would be an incredibly large number which would be inconvenient to deal with. Hence, we use a different unit (like light years) to make our numbers smaller and manageable.(5 votes)
- First. sad'asdasdasdasd(3 votes)
- what is K2？？？？？？？？？？ can anyone please tell me?(2 votes)
- It is the second largest mountain(2 votes)
- at3:16he said we are nowhere near to finding the height of an atom but a height of an atom is 100 picometer(2 votes)
- what is k2(2 votes)
- Its the second tallest mountain(tallest in winter due to snow accumulation) located in Pakistan(1 vote)
- At2:35-2:42Sal says that if we were measuring jewelry and we had a 3/4" piece to measure that an inch gradient would be enough precision, however, I have heard that we would need a measuring stick with fractions of an inch gradients to make a measurement.(1 vote)
- Under a powerful microscope , The surface imperfections on the surface means the surface in one area is slightly more bumpier than another , increasingly so , the smaller in measurement scale you measure with. So distance between 2 points are not precisely the same when comparing a measurement alongside it(1 vote)
- Now a google search for the height of Mount Everest says 8,849 meters tall.(1 vote)
- In this video, we're going to talk a little bit about measurement. and the idea that you really can't measure exactly the dimensions of something. And I know what you' re thinking, You' re like, well, no, of course, we can measure the dimensions of something. Let's say I have some type of a gear over here. So let me draw my gear, and if I were to ask you, that's not the best drawing gear, but if I were to ask you, what's the inner diameter of the hole of the gear, right over here? Maybe you take a ruler out, right over here. So this is my ruler. And that you are able to see when you measure it, that it is one centimeter in diameter. But then I say, is it exactly one centimeter? And then you realize, well, yeah, let me get a little bit more precise. Maybe you get a magnifying glass out here. So this is the lens of my magnifying glass. And you zoom in a little bit. Maybe you get a better ruler that marks off the millimeters and you actually say, Oh, well, when I look a little bit closer, it actually turns out it's not exactly one centimeter. It's actually closer to 1.1 centimeters. And then I ask you, is that exactly the inner diameter of this gear here? And like, okay, well let me get out of microscope. And then you realize, Oh, you' re right, it's actually 1.089 centimeters. And then I ask you, is that exactly right? And then you' re like, yeah, I guess you' re right. I haven't measured to the nearest, to the height or the width of an atom, to do that I would need a lot more precision right over here. And so maybe I need some type of an electron microscope, but even if you're able to do that, and that would be many decimal places to the right of the decimal point here, if you're measuring in centimeters, you can still ask, was is that exactly right? Maybe you can measure the parts of an atom or to a measurement even smaller than an atom And if later on, you might study quantum physics and there are some levels of granularity where you can't get a true measurement below that, but as you can see, it is somewhat arbitrary for our everyday life. And so the question is, which one do you pick? Or how much trouble do you get? Or how much trouble do you take to get to these different levels of precision? And the answer is, it just depends. If the goal was, hey, we just wanna make multiple copies of maybe jewelry of this little car gear, so we're gonna wanna put, some type of, I don't know, gold chain through it. And we say, hey, we need at least three quarters of a centimeter in order to get the rope or the chain through it. Well then this first measurement, that's enough precision. But if I told you this gear is going to be an essential part of the space shuttle, or some type of really important machinery, that has really fine tolerances, I guess people aren't using the spacial anymore, but some finally engineered automobile or something that's going to have a lot of needs, really close tolerances it needs to be really, really precise. Well then even this 1.089 centimeters might not be enough. You might have to get to something like it's 1.089203 centimeters, to be able to be really, really finely crafted. We're nowhere close with our everyday tools to get anywhere close to say the width or the height of an atom and you could even theory measure within the atom. And so you just have to think about what the measurement is for. I'll give another example, this right over here is a picture of Mount Everest. You might know it as the tallest mountain in the world. And if you were to ask someone, how tall is Mount Everest? If you were to do a web search for it right now, you would find that it is 8,848 meters tall. Now, this is clearly rounded to the nearest meter because if you were to go to the top of Mount Everest, you'll see little pebbles. In fact, those pebbles might move around. And so the actual precise height of Mount Everest might change actually second by second, depending if rain is falling, snow is falling, how the wind is moving different pebbles around, but for most of our daily purposes, this is sufficient. In fact, for a lot of us, we might not even need this level of precision. We might say, hey, it's roughly or it's approximately, we'd estimate that it's about 9,000 meters. But there are applications where you would need at least this level of precision, or maybe something even more precise. For example, if you wanted to compare it to another mountain, say K2, which is the second tallest mountain in the world. And let's say they are close in height, and actually, if you were to do a Google search, you would see that K2, has a height of 8,611 meters rounded to the nearest meter. You'd see that, that 9,000 meter approximation. It wouldn't be enough if you're round to the nearest kilometer, I guess, that wouldn't be enough to be able to compare Mount Everest to K2, because rounded to the nearest kilometer, they're both approximately nine kilometers. So this is approximately 9,000 meters as well. So you would need more precision. If you wanted to answer which one is taller, you'd have to get at least to the closest hundred meter. And then there's reasons why you might wanna get even more precise. Maybe you wanna create a slide from the top of K2 to the bottom of K2. And so you can imagine if your slide is too long by, let's say three meters, what's going to be hard to get on that slide on the top, or it's going to dig into the snow at the bottom. And if your slide is too short by three meters, that's a pretty unpleasant thing to have you go on this seemingly super fun slide, you have to drop nine feet at the end, or really if you' re off, what if you're off by 10 meters and you're gonna drop 30 feet off the end, which could really break some bones and be unpleasant. So the big takeaway is, it's very hard to measure anything perfectly precisely. And you have to think about, what's the application? What are you trying to answer? What are you trying to judge about those things? To determine how much precision you need in your measurement.