Main content
World history
Course: World history > Unit 2
Lesson 7: The Roman EmpireFall of the Roman Empire
The Roman Empire became less stable over the course of the Third to Fifth centuries CE. Historians point to internal divisions as well as repeated invasions from tribes such as the Huns and the Visigoths as reasons why the Empire fell. The fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred in 476 CE.
Want to join the conversation?
- I though the Huns weren't really Conquerors? I've heard from Terry Jones Barbarians that the Huns didn't really conquer, so much as look for gold and run a protection racket? Does anybody have anything on this, perhaps there is historian disagreement, or just made up?(7 votes)
- The Huns came from central Asia and they were so fierce that they start pushing more of the Germanic Tribes across the Rhine. They seek refuge with the Romans however they are treated very poorly.(4 votes)
- Around, Sal says that the Roman Empire lasted roughly 1,000 years before Odoacer overtook the emperor at Ravenna. However, I thought that it wasn't considered an empire until Augustus takes rule in roughly 27 BCE. Wouldn't this make it roughly 500 years, not 1,000? 9:32(1 vote)
- I think Saul meant the Roman empire without the capital "E." The Roman Republic, though not ruled by emperors, could still be considered an empire as it pursued a policy of rapid expansion throughout much of its existence. So, you could say that the Roman empire lasted from the beginning of the Roman Republic to the Fall of Ravenna, whereas the Roman Empire started from the reign of Augustus to the takeover by Odoacer.(11 votes)
- How did Christianity affect the downfall of the Roman Empire? I know that it made people stop believing that the Emperor was a god but how did it break the Roman Empire. Please help me as soon as possible because I have to do a project on this topic.(4 votes)
- 1: You are mistaken if you believe that Christianity broke the Roman Empire. It is more likely that it propped up and prolonged the empire (in the West).
2) Believing that one's national leader (whether a king, and emperor, a president or a prime minister) is a god or ordained by heaven is NOT beneficial to a free people.
3) You might find some help for your project here: https://www.ushistory.org/civ/6f.asp
4) or here: http://www.politicalsciencenotes.com/medieval-political-thought/rise-of-christianity-with-fall-of-roman-empire/1049(3 votes)
- Why did Constantinople last so much longer than the west?(3 votes)
- Various factors can explain this: the Eastern Roman provinces being traditionally richer, Constantine moving the capital to Constantinople, Germanic tribes pushing into Western Roman territory more than Eastern Roman territory, etc.(5 votes)
- One thing I never understood: how could the germanic peoples have so many iron weapons as to allow them to face such military force as that of the Roman Empire? I mean, Rome was a highly organized society, with large cities that had specialized artisans (blacksmiths, in this case) and a chain of production to supply the military with enough weapons. But the germanics led a tribal way of life, how could they fabricate such massive quantities of iron weapons? Maybe it was something traditionaly taught at every household?(5 votes)
- Did the Berber raids and disruptions of Rome's North African food supply have anything to do with the Fall of Rome?(4 votes)
- There's a good article here about the relations between the Berbers and Rome, https://www.ancient.eu/Berbers/ but nothing in it about your idea about Berber Raids and the fall of Rome hundreds of years later.(3 votes)
- Is diocletian the christian emperor or last emperor(3 votes)
- He wasn’t Christian or the last Roman emperor. His administration, so to speak, actually carried out the most severe persecution of Christians in Roman history.(3 votes)
- So, the Roman Empire was split in two parts []. If the capital of the whole empire was moved from Rome to Byzantium (Constantinople) [ 2:10], how could the western part have had its own capital [ 3:58] that could be moved from Rome to Ravenna? 7:05
So there was the empire's capital, and also there were two capitals? I'm confused.(3 votes)- Consider 21st century Bolivia, where the constitutionally recognized capital is Sucre, and the seat of government is La Paz. The Roman Empire, with it's "constitutionally recognized capital" in Byzantium could easily have had a "Western Division Administrative Center" in Rome, Ravenna or anywhere else.(3 votes)
- What types of contributions did the Romans make in the sphere of law?(2 votes)
- Roman law, as revealed through ancient legal texts, literature, papyri, wax tablets and inscriptions, covered such facets of everyday Roman life as crime(4 votes)
- I don't really get what were huns. Like I know there were conquerors, but what empire were they from?(2 votes)
- Considering the Huns were a nomadic people group composed of hunters, it is indeed the case that they moved out of Asia through Eastern Europe due to population pressures of various kinds. Thus, historians have been able to narrow down potential lands of origin for the Hunnic peoples. The likeliest of these is the Xiongnu confederation in what is modern day Mongolia. The proto-Mongolian peoples of the steppe faced various external pressures from the Han dynasty of China which ultimately incurred a massive migration west through southern Siberia. The time periods of these events coincide as well given that the Huns begin pressuring the Germanic peoples bordering the Roman Empire over 300 years after the collapse of the Xiongnu confederation.(4 votes)
Video transcript
- [Instructor] In the
last video we talk about the first 200 years of Rome
being an official empire, starting with Augustus in 27 BCE, going all the way to Marcus Aurelius, and that time period is referred to as Pax Romana, Roman Peace. It's a relatively stable, relatively peaceful time for Rome. Now all of that is relative. If you're one of the tribes that are still fighting
with the Roman legions, if you're one of the roughly 1/4 to 1/3 of the population that is a slave, you might not view this
as such a good time. But things only get worse after the death of Marcus Aurelius, who's viewed as the last
of the five good emperors, so to speak. His son, Commodus, takes over, and Commodus is the beginning
of a succession of emperors who are less and less competent. The Empire becomes more and more corrupt, less and less stable, and things really come to a head and start to decelerate even further, or I guess accelerate downward
even further, in 235 CE when the emperor Severus
Alexander is assassinated, and this throws the empire
into a 50-year crisis called the Third Century Crisis because it happened in the third century. And over this 50 years, there's
26 claimants to emperor. The empire is temporarily split
into three different states. There's attacks from the
east from the Sassanids, the Sassanian Empire,
they're the successors to the Parthians. You have attacks across
the Rhine and the Danube from Germanic tribes. All of that makes this a very
unstable period for Rome. Now the Third Century
Crisis is considered to end in 284 with the ascension of Diocletian, and Diocletian is viewed as a somewhat, or a reasonably strong emperor. He's known as the last emperor that really persecuted the Christians because they didn't
follow the Roman religion, they did not worship the emperor as a god, but he's also, or maybe
he's most famous for splitting the empire. He decides that probably
one of the main causes of the Third Century Crisis is that the empire has gotten too vast. It has too many borders. It's hard for one emperor to
administer the whole thing, so he splits it into East and West from an administrative point of view. They don't become separate empires, but he decides that he is going to rule from the East and that he will have a co-emperor who rules from the West. And not only does he set that up, but he sets up what's called a tetrarchy. Beyond himself and his co-emperor, they each have a second-in-command that if any one of them were to die or would have to retire somehow, that that second-in-command
could take over, and once again, this is to
address some of the issues of the Third Century Crisis where the wars for succession, and this isn't just during the Third Century Crisis. We've seen it in multiple videos. Rome is famous, even
during the Pax Romana, for these really ugly succession battles, but as we'll see, the
splitting of the empire into East and West, even though it started as an administrative
thing, over time it's going to become a real split
and they're going to turn into two different empires. Now after Diocletian, you have
another significant emperor. You have Constantine, and Constantine is known for many things. Maybe most famously, he
embraced Christianity, as opposed to Diocletian
who persecuted Christians, you have the Council of
Nicaea and the Nicaean Code where there's now a
uniform church doctrine around Christianity. He has the Edict of Milan,
which makes Christianity legal under Roman rule. Maybe most famously on his deathbed, he gets baptized. He becomes the first Christian emperor. He also moves the capital to, officially moves the capital
of the entire empire, to what at the time was Byzantium, but then he renames it to Constantinople, named after him. Now it was still one unified empire, even Diocletian who
co-ruled with a co-emperor, he had veto power over
the emperor to the West. Now as we get further into
the fourth century here, and especially into the fifth century, we'll see that the empire
further and further fragments, and gets diluted, and
really just breaks down. One major factor in that breakdown is in that fourth century, in the fourth and fifth centuries, you have a group called the Huns coming
in from Central Asia, coming in from Northern
Europe right over here, and they are fierce, nomadic conquerors, and they're so fierce
that they start pushing more of the Germanic
tribes across the Rhine and the Danube, and a lot
of these Germanic tribes, at first, even though their history has been fighting the
Romans, a lot of them try to seek refuge in the Roman Empire and they're given refuge
in the Roman Empire, but while they have that refuge, they're treated very, very, very badly, and all of that comes to a head in the, well I guess you could
say, the last quarter of the fourth century
with the Gothic Wars, and the Gothic Wars really
have a decisive battle at Adrianople, originally Adrianopolis, named after the Emperor Hadrian. And at Adrianopolis, at Adrianople, the Gothic tribes in particular, and when we say Gothic,
we're really talking about Germanic tribes, and
this one in particular, as you can see from this
legend right over here, this is the Visigoths, or Western Goths, they're able to decisively defeat the Eastern Roman Emperor Valens. He's actually killed at Adrianople, and then the Visigoths just
continue to hang out here in the Roman Empire. They continue to move forward. In 410, they're able to actually sack Rome and they eventually settle
in the Iberian Peninsula and in Southern Gaul. Now after the Battle of Adrianople, you have another significant
emperor, Theodosius, because what you'll see is that Diocletian persecuted Christians, Constantine now embraces Christianity, he becomes a Christian, he
says Christianity is legal. Theodosius now, right
as we are about to enter into the fifth century,
he makes Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire. So in roughly 100 years, the Roman Empire went from persecuting Christians to making it the official religion and actually going the other way, starting to persecute some of
the pre-Christian religions or rituals. The other thing that happens as we enter into the fifth century now, as we go into the fifth century, you have the capital of the Western Empire is
moved from Rome to Ravenna. With the idea, the
emperor see all of these Germanic tribes, they
feel threatened by them, that Ravenna is easier to defend. It's surrounded by kind
of marshy, swampy area. The other thing of note about Theodosius, and as we move into
really the last century of the Western Roman Empire, is Theodosius was the last Roman Emperor
to rule all of Rome. After that, the East
and West are going to be ruled essentially independently. They're essentially going
to be separate empires. Then as we get into the fifth century, we already talked about
the Visigoths sacking Rome, then in 455, you have the Vandals which is another Germanic tribe that was similarly originally
pushed out by the Huns. You see them in blue right over here. They make it down the Iberian Peninsula to North Africa. They eventually get to Carthage, and they become a little
bit of a naval power and they eventually are able to, in 455, sack Rome as well. So Rome is really taking
a hit multiple times. And then finally, the
end of the Roman Empire, or the Western Roman
Empire that most historians consider the end of the Roman Empire, is when the Germanic
ruler General Odoacer, or Odoacker depending
on how you pronounce it, is able to oust the emperor in Ravenna, and so then you have the official, and just to be clear, this
is, let me write Roman Empire, and so Odoacer is able to essentially end the Western Empire as we know it. And after that, the Western Empire becomes more and more fragmented into these kingdoms that are ruled by essentially Germanic
kings, and then we are now entering into the Middle Ages. Now the big question that historians have a lot of fun thinking about is why did all of this happen? Why did the Roman Empire fall? And before we even talk about why it fell, we should give them a
little bit of credit. Even in this video where I talk about the fall of the Roman Empire, I'm covering 300 years of history, and if you start with the
founding of the republic until Odoacer takes over
Ravenna, ousts the emperor, we're talking 1,000 years. Most civilizations,
most empires don't last anywhere near that long. So to some degree, it's
surprising that it lasted so long. But in terms of the causes of its decline, we've talked about several
of them in this video. The empire got divided. The East and West stopped
viewing themselves so much as the same empire. Trade sometimes broke down. They didn't support each other militarily. The Eastern Empire was generally stronger, so it allowed invading tribes to focus on the weak point in the West. Some historians would
say that the Roman Empire stopped expanding, and
it needed that expansion in order to keep getting
more land and more slaves that really drove its economy. One major factor probably was the Huns that caused this great
migration in the fourth and fifth centuries, it
caused the Germanic tribes to cross the Rhine and cross the Danube and become either settled as part of the Roman Empire or
threatened the Roman Empire. Another theory, and all of
these are probably contributors, is that as the Germanic tribes settled, they actually became more and more part of the Roman military, and some of them were officially part of the military, some of them were mercenaries,
soldiers for fortune, paid soldiers, and so you
can imagine their allegiance to Rome was not as strong. Some folks say Christianity
may have been a factor. That the empire might have lasted, especially when people were doing what their traditional rites, rituals, they worshiped an emperor,
but now Christianity wasn't about worshiping
an emperor anymore. A lot of people think it's
corruption, instability, and we've talked a little bit about that. It could've been invasions, not just from the Germanic tribes and the Huns, but also the Sassanids on the East. So I'll leave you there,
and to think about, what was the cause or maybe what allowed the Roman Empire to survive for so long?