Main content
Course: US government and civics > Unit 1
Lesson 6: Ratification of the US Constitution- The Constitutional Convention
- Constitutional compromises: The Electoral College
- Constitutional compromises: The Three-Fifths Compromise
- The impact of constitutional compromises on us today
- The Constitution of the United States
- Article V and the Amendment Process
- Article V of the Constitution: Amendment Process
- Article VI of the Constitution: Debts, Supremacy, Oaths, Religious Tests
- Article VII of the Constitution: Ratification
- Ratification of the US Constitution: lesson overview
- Ratification of the US Constitution
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Article V and the Amendment Process
How can citizens amend the US Constitution?
Key points
- An amendment is a change or addition to the Constitution.
- When drafting the Constitution, the Framers detailed an amendment process in Article V that gave citizens avenues to change the Constitution.
Why do we need an amendment process?
The Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1789, making it the oldest constitution in the modern world.
As the United States has continued to grow and face unique challenges brought on through modern warfare, alliances, and technology, some critics have argued that the Framers of the Constitution could not have foreseen the changes the United States would experience. What can we do to update the Constitution to address these new issues? Well, the Framers thought of a solution: citizens could propose changes to the Constitution.
The Framers added a process for amending, or changing, the Constitution in Article V. Since 1789, the United States has added 27 amendments to the Constitution. An amendment is a change to the Constitution. The first ten amendments to the Constitution became known as the Bill of Rights. These first amendments were designed to protect individual rights and liberties, like the right to free speech and the right to trial by jury.
Article V
Article V describes the process for amending the Constitution. But the Framers intended for the amendment process to be difficult: although the federal government could propose amendments, three-fourths of states have to ratify every amendment.
“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.”
Article V, The United States Constitution, 1787
There are two avenues for amending the Constitution: the congressional proposal method and the convention method. In the congressional proposal method, two-thirds of both chambers of Congress must propose an amendment. The proposed amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures, as chosen by Congress.
Congress has proposed all 27 amendments to the Constitution of the United States. 26 of these amendments were passed by three-fourths of state legislatures and one amendment was passed by three-fourths of state conventions.
In the state convention method, two-thirds of states ask Congress to organize a convention. The amendment is proposed at this meeting. As in the congressional proposal method, the proposed amendment then must be ratified by three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures, as chosen by Congress. The state convention method has never been used to introduce an amendment.
Challenges to the amendment process
Between 1789 and 2014, over 11,000 amendments have been proposed; however, only 27 amendments have been ratified. Why is it so hard for proposed amendments to receive support for final ratification? A few roadblocks are standing in the way.
First, every amendment must receive support from three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures. It’s incredibly difficult to get that many states to agree on a permanent change to the Constitution.
Take, for example, the Equal Rights Amendment, or ERA. The ERA was introduced in 1923. It finally passed Congress in 1972 and was sent to the states for ratification. The ERA was designed to guarantee equal rights for all citizens regardless of sex. It fell three states short of ratification and so was not added to the Constitution.
Second, for an amendment to be passed through the congressional proposal method, two-thirds of Congress must propose the amendment. To introduce a new amendment the two parties must cooperate, as rarely has one party controlled two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. With each party supporting different ideological goals, getting two-thirds of Congress to agree on a change to the Constitution is nearly impossible without some level of cooperation.
The process is so difficult that it could take years before the US Constitution has its 28th amendment. Some amendments continue to pop up in Congress, including an amendment requiring Congress to pass a balanced budget, an amendment setting term limits for members of Congress, and amendments defining who can get married.
What do you think the 28th amendment will be?
Food for thought
- Besides the amendment process, how can the federal government change the Constitution?
- Why do you think the United States has never had an amendment pass through the convention method?
Want to join the conversation?
I think the 28th amendment will definitely be setting term limits for Congress. I hope whoever wins the 2024 election does, because there are many young people who deserve to be in Congress but are hindered by the oldies taking all the spots.(17 votes)
What is the informal process for amending the constitution?(12 votes)
Well, the informal process or the actual process for successfully amending the Constitution would require massive, massive public mobilization in favour of the amendment as 2/3rds of both Houses of Congress and 3/4ths of state legislatures will have to vote in favour of the amendment and they won't do it unless there is public pressure on them to do it. Not just public support but enthusiastic and active public support is required. Also, many compromises and concessions must be made on the text of the amendment because the amendment must not scare or offend any large group of people or either political party, otherwise they will make sure that the amendment does not get the required votes.(5 votes)
how many amendments are there(0 votes)
there are 27 amendments (I'm writing this much because khan wants me to type a lot)(5 votes)
Why has it becoming increasingly more difficult to change the Constitution as we have grown as a country?(3 votes)- The support of 2/3rds of members of Congress and 3/4ths of state legislature is required to ratify a constitutional amendment. Amending the Constitution has always been hard and it was supposed to be so, but it has become even more harder because from 13 states in 1789, there are 50 states in the United States as of today and hence a whopping 38 states are needed to ratify an amendment. This is why amending the constitution has become so hard. A very high level of public awareness and consensus is needed to successfully amend the Constitution and in fact, it is possible for as few as 2% of the population to block an amendment according to the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. I hope this answers your question.(5 votes)
What is the convention method? By 2/3 of national convention and 3/4 of state conventions, is that like 2/3 of national population and 3/4 of states?(4 votes)- It is a distinct method used to amend amendments through 2/3 of the national population then 3/4 of state conventions.This method was created by the Founding Fathers to prevent the Federal Government from having complete control of the amendments. The convention method is different from the congressional method like I said the convention method does not take votes/proposals from the Legislative Branch so basically the Federal Government while the Congressional Branch does include votes/proposals for that amendment(1 vote)
What is the point of the different methods? Why does there need to be two?(2 votes)
Hi emersondehass. The reason there are multiple methods is that the Founding Fathers feared giving too much power to the Federal Government and not enough to the states. The convention method exists so that the Federal Government does not have complete control of amendments.(5 votes)
- Why hasn't the US ever had an amendment pass through the convention method? Could it be that for a convention to take place, there has to be even more cooperation than the congressional method since the states that are interested in proposing the amendment would have to organize a national convention through the convention method? What do you guys think?(2 votes)
Fun fact, the Constitution is actually 234 years old now! :)(2 votes)- Shouldn't it be some other way to propose an amendment regarding Congress term limits than Congress themselves? It seems obvious they'll never support it.(2 votes)
im hoping the 28th one will be government funded healthcare(1 vote)