Main content
Europe 1300 - 1800
Holbein the Younger, the Ambassadors
Hans Holbein the Younger, The Ambassadors, 1533, oil on oak, 207 x 209.5 cm (The National Gallery, London). View this work up close on the Google Art Project.. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Do you think it is coincidence that, in order to see the skull, you have to go to the right edge of the painting and crouch down a bit, but in doing so you are facing and "kneeling before" the crucifix as if you would in a church?(77 votes)
- Is anything coincidence in this painting?(38 votes)
- is the crucifix supposed to be a hidden symbol of death?(20 votes)
- The skull is supposed to be a symbol of death, and if you are here because of the cryptology challenge I suggest you look there for more hints. :)(52 votes)
- The distorted skull in this painting is certainly unusual. Are there other paintings that we know of that do something similar, that have hidden images like this? Or is this detail unique to this painting?(10 votes)
- The technique is called "anamorphosis". The first known use of perspectival anamorphosis is a drawing by Leonardo da Vinci of an eye done in 1485. It is unusual for the technique to be used in a painting such as it is here. The technique was mostly used in trompe l’oeil murals, such as Pozzo's ceiling of the Church of St. Ignazio. There is also mirror anamorphosis where cylindrical mirror is placed in the center of a picture transforming a distorted image into a clear one viewed on the mirror.(12 votes)
- @Why would a lute be a traditional way to learn perspective? Why not a spinning wheel? Or a chair? Or a recorder? Or anything else? Why a lute? 2:55(7 votes)
- A lute would be a good study since it contains lines (the strings and neck) that would need to converge in perspective, as well as a curved body which is more difficult to recreate in perspective. A chair or recorder might be too simple a study, since they are mostly just "lines". Learning to paint a lute would be a good, challenging study piece.(13 votes)
- What does this pertain to the challenge about Cryptography challenge 101 (https://www.khanacademy.org/math/applied-math/applied_math_challenges/cryptochallenge/a/introduction)?(7 votes)
- The skull is almost meant to mislead you, using statistical analysis I deduced that of the length of the key of the Vigenère cipher for the second note was only 4 letters, simple analysis further returned that the key was SPOILER 'dddd' although if you made it this far it's unfair to be misled by the "skull" which really should be the key. The skull key is the key for the next cipher (after repeating some letters), but as for this cipher it comes out as: "startigrabbedeverythingicouldfindpleasereturnanyblueprintsforvaultaic
hbankyoudecideoniamsettingupsafehouseco..."(5 votes)
- Why put the skull in? Yes it sends a message, but it seems so out of place with the rest of the painting.(7 votes)
- It does seem out of place (heavily so) and I completely agree with your perspective. However, the purpose of this painting, in my opinion, is to express the contrast between reality/supernatural and hold extreme symbolic value than be a perfectly portioned, neat artwork. In order for the "moral" of this painting to be present, he had to break the rules. :)(3 votes)
- Who came here because of the Cryptography Challenge?(7 votes)
- At first that thing on the floor looked like a part of a drum set, but then I thought that it was someone, but now I don't know what it is! Please help!(1 vote)
- Put the bridge of your nose against the right-hand edge of your computer sceen and move your head up and down until you see the skull. If anyone asks you "What on earth are you doing?" reply that "I am learning to apreciate art!"(8 votes)
- Why is the crucifix and skull there? Why is the crucifix hidden? Why is the skull distorted? Why is the lute slightly distorted also? What is the message behind the skull and crucifix?(3 votes)
- Is anything known about who commissioned the painting or what the reaction to it was at the time? It's message seems so complex and open to misinterpretation for a portrait of two men whose position might be considered politically sensitive in England at the time. Is there any evidence that Holbein felt constrained by his patron's or the court's political views?(2 votes)
- Jean de Dinteville, a french Diplomat stationed in England commissioned the painting. This was a piece that was meant for a private setting (his residence).(2 votes)
Video transcript
(light piano music) - [Beth] We're looking at
Holbein's "The Ambassadors" from 1533 here in the
National Gallery in London. - [Steven] This is a painting that's actually about
the things we can't see. - [Beth] See on the
left, Jean de Dinteville. He was an ambassador from
France living in England. And on the right, Georges
de Selve, his friend, a bishop and also an ambassador. - [Steven] Both of these
men are in England, and Holbein, who was a Swiss
painter, had moved to England because he could get work here. And in fact, within a short
time after making this painting, he would actually become the painter to the King of England, Henry VIII. - [Beth] King Henry VIII
is about to break away from the Catholic Church. And we know that the French ambassador was in England to keep
an eye on Henry VIII during this tumultuous period. - [Steven] We see within the painting references to the turmoil that
is taking place in England, but it's all within an
even greater context. - [Beth] So let's start with the two men. We see Jean de Dinteville on the left, and he's the one who
commissioned this painting, and he's the one whose
house the painting hung in. And he's obviously represented
as an enormously wealthy and successful man with
this fur-lined cloak and velvet and satin clothing. He has a dagger on which is
inscribed his age, which was 29. So he's a very young man. Holbein described his clothing with a sense of clarity and detail that we expect of that Northern tradition that Holbein in comes from. And then on the right, Georges de Selve is dressed more modestly in a fur cloak. The book that he's got his elbow on has inscribed on it his age, which was 25. - [Steven] And it is an
interesting contrast. We have that dagger on the one side and the book on the other, references which were
actually quite traditional to the active versus
the contemplative life. - [Beth] We're meant to
look at both of them, but even more than that,
perhaps we're meant to look at what's in the
middle of the painting, which is all these objects on
these two levels of shelves. - [Steven] Holbein is just brilliant in his ability to render textures and the material reality of those objects. They also mean something. - [Beth] On the top shelf, we
have objects that are related to the study of astronomy
and to the measuring of time, and on the lower shelf,
things that are more earthly. We have a terrestrial globe and a lute and a book about arithmetic
and a book of hymns. - [Steven] The painting is
functioning basically as a grid. On the left, you have the active life, on the right, you have
the contemplative life, at the top, you've got
the celestial sphere, at the bottom, the terrestrial sphere. Look at the beautifully foreshortened lute on the bottom shelf. Lutes were traditionally objects that were rendered in
order to learn perspective. And here there's this masterful
representation of the way in which that lute is much
shorter than it should be because we're seeing it on end. But if you look very closely, you can see that one of the
strings is actually snapped. - [Beth] Art historians
understand this as referring to the discord in the Church
in Europe at this time. - [Steven] That can also
be seen in the hymnbook, which is just below that. It's open, and it's so precisely painted that it can actually be read. It's a translation of a
hymn by Martin Luther, the head of the Protestant Reformation. All of this luxury, all of these objects, all the extraordinary
fashion that they wear, all this stands on a mosaic floor with this beautifully detailed tiling. And it's seen in perfect
linear perspective. And this is reference to an actual floor at Westminster Abbey. That floor in that church
is actually a diagram, and it's meant to represent the macrocosm, that is, the cosmic order. - [Beth] Look at the very large form that occupies the foreground. - [Steven] I had a student once that said it looked like a piece of driftwood that had somehow been placed
down oddly in the foreground. - [Beth] What we're really looking at is an anamorphic image, a kind of image that's been artificially
stretched in perspective. But when you go to the right
corner of the painting, crouched down a bit- - [Steven] Or look at it
in a mirror at an angle. And it's a human skull. - [Beth] It's something that you can't see when you can see the other
things in the painting, but it's something you can see when you don't see the other
things in the painting. - [Steven] Front and
center in this painting, really, in a sense, the
star of the painting, is this skull, which is a
traditional symbol of death. - [Beth] A memento mori. - [Steven] A reminder of death. And that's a very common element
that we see in paintings. But here, we have a painting
that seemed for a moment to be celebrating these
earthly achievements, and now seems to be undercutting it. If you look even more carefully, in the extreme upper-left
corner of the painting, peeking out from behind the curtain, you can just make out a little
sculpture of a crucifixion. - [Beth] But then we have this question that goes back to Holbein, and
that is about representation. So you have the lute that's
perfectly foreshortened or that floor that's a perfect
perspective illusion also. So this ability to render
reality so perfectly. And then you have Holbein
choosing to represent the skull in an unnaturalistic way. So choosing to represent the earthly things in a realistic way, but choosing to represent
that which is supernatural, or that which is transcendent, in a way that is not according
to that perfect illusionism. - [Steven] And I think Holbein really wants us to see that contrast. Look at the relationship
between the lute and the skull. The skull is distorted so extremely that it really is hard to read. But when we think about
stretching something, you generally think about
stretching it horizontally or perhaps vertically. But to do so diagonally
is very particular. The lute is resting on that shelf. It really is foreshortened at an angle that is very close to the angle of the distortion of the skull. But remember, a foreshortening is another kind of distortion. And so in a sense, they
are both distortions, but one is a distortion that creates a reality of our world, as we see. But it's reminder that perhaps what we see is not really truth. - [Beth] It's not all there is. - [Steven] This painting was all about what these men had achieved in life. - [Beth] And what human beings
had achieved historically for our investigation of the world. And so the two elements
that are half hidden in this painting, the
crucifix and the skull, point to the limits of earthly life, the limits of earthly
vision, of man's knowledge, and the inevitability of death and the promise of Christ's
sacrifice on the cross. (light piano music)