Europe 1300 - 1800
- Who was Albrecht Dürer?
- Albrecht Dürer
- Dürer, The Triumphal Arch or Arch of Honor
- Dürer, Self-portrait, Study of a Hand and a Pillow
- Dürer, Self-portrait (1498)
- Dürer, Self-portrait (1500)
- Dürer, Self-portrait
- Dürer, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
- Dürer, the Large Piece of Turf
- Albrecht Dürer, Adam and Eve
- Dürer, Adam and Eve
- Dürer, Melencolia
- Decoding art: Dürer's Melencolia I
- What is Melencolia?
- Dürer, Four Apostles
- Dürer's woodcuts and engravings
Albrecht Dürer, Self-portrait, 1498, oil on panel, 52 x 41 cm (Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid) Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker . Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- How old was Dürer when he died?(6 votes)
- Since this a self-portrait of Durer does that mean that he was the patron and would he have held onto the painting himself in his workshop or home?(6 votes)
- Why is it that the bottom of the painting says 97 when the title says 98?(3 votes)
- Please look again, the painting does read 1498. Have a look here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Albrecht_D%C3%BCrer,Selbstbildnis_mit_26_Jahren(Prado,_Madrid).jpg(2 votes)
- i noticed in the close up that his eyes seem to have different colours, is it known if he actually had eyes with different colours, or was this just for him to show off how well he could paint different eye colours?(3 votes)
- He does look like a "dandy" doesn't he? I wonder if he was seen that way during the era in which this was painted among his contemporaries?(3 votes)
- How did he paint him self? . . . . My mom said they did not have mirrors.(2 votes)
- There are many other reflective surfaces in existence - the first mirrors were made in Egypt out of bronze (I think).(2 votes)
SPEAKER 1: We're in the Prado in Madrid, and we're looking at Albrecht Durer's self-portrait from 1498, where he shows himself, for me, almost like a dandy. SPEAKER 2: He painted this when he was 26, and that's what the inscription says below the window. You can see that he's proud of his looks and proud of his clothes, and mostly proud of how he could paint. SPEAKER 1: It's so interesting because he is creating himself here. But he's representing himself not only in terms of his likeness, not only in terms of the class that he's aspiring to, not only in terms of his representation of his own aesthetics in terms of his choice of costume, but he's representing himself as a painter as well, right? As a craftsman, as somebody who is extraordinarily capable. And yet at the same time, he's also negating that very ability by rendering himself not in the guise of an artist, of a workman, but wearing actually incredibly expensive kid gloves and very much not in a workshop environment, but as if he were a nobleman. SPEAKER 2: Right. I mean, it's important to remember that when an artist paints a self-portrait, he's actually probably looking in a mirror. And you know, he's got paint. He's got brushes in his hands. And he's in his studio, and he's painting. So there's a real conscious decision to remove those things and to show himself in another way. And so the hands are completely fabricated. SPEAKER 1: And yet in some ways, this is still very much, for me, tied to his identity as an artist. I think he's not only representing himself, but he's representing his abilities-- in a sense, a kind of portfolio piece. SPEAKER 2: Laying claim to art as something that is intellectual. SPEAKER 1: Ah, see, that's the key, right? This notion that painting is in fact, as you said, an intellectual activity, not just the work of a craftsman, of a cabinet maker. SPEAKER 2: Exactly. But something which happens in the artist's mind, and therefore worthy of a different kind and level of respect. And I think that's very much here.