Main content
Europe 1300 - 1800
Course: Europe 1300 - 1800 > Unit 5
Lesson 11: Hugo van der GoesVan der Goes, The Adoration of the Kings
Hugo van der Goes, The Adoration of the Kings (Monforte Altar), c. 1470, oil on oak, 147 x 242 cm (Gemäldegalerie, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin). Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why is Mary so pale?(11 votes)
- her paleness is a symbol of purity.(9 votes)
- I wonder why there are always backgrounds in old paintings. Even when the artist tries to direct your attention to something placed indoors, even in portraits, there still must be some outdoor scenery displayed. Like in this painting, ven fer Goes went so far as to cut out the wall, as if it isn't finished, just so that we can see a few trees, buildings and townspeople.(6 votes)
- Notice the contents of the outdoors: sheep, shepherds, stockmen and beasts of burden. These pastoral animals and their handlers have significant symbolism in Judeo-Christian history.
Furthermore, the pasture has symbolic meaning. During the late Medieval period the "locus amoenus" played a significant role in art and literature. Notice in this painting a scene from a town on our left and a scene of a pastoral place on our right? You have to think that these scenes were painted with a purpose, nothing exhibited in a painting is placed there without some meaning or purpose. Understanding the symbolism of the garden and the animals will shed light on why there are always backgrounds in old paintings.(12 votes)
- why is Joseph so old?(3 votes)
- Jesus had half siblings. Mary did NOT remain a perpetual virgin.(1 vote)
- Does anyone know why they "three men" are referred to as "kings" and not "magi?" Since they came due to their knowledge of the stars and what they herald, magi would seem the appropriate title and the one most often used. They are called magi in the New Testament. Hugo van der Goes like many painters overstates their wealth in gifts and clothing and others include a large retinue on horseback. However, I think their calling as astrologers from the east bringing their very best to Jesus would indicate the Adoration of the Magi.(3 votes)
- There two terms for the "three men" are often used interchangeably. While many would not deny that they were definitely magi, various translations interpret them as kings, while others as simply "wise men."(3 votes)
- I think the singular of 'magi' is 'magus'.(2 votes)
- In Latin, it is. In English, it is used in the plural form even when addressing a single person.(6 votes)
- Why does Mary always wear dark blue?(1 vote)
- Ultramarine Blue was the most expensive paint ( ground lapis lazuli, a semi-precious stone). As a result its use was reserved for the most important figures in paintings. Mary was often this figure, and so over time she became associated with clothes of ultramarine blue.(7 votes)
- Is there any symbolic significance in the choice of painting iris and columbine flowers? Do they have Biblical connotations? Or are they just a part of the pastoral scene?(1 vote)
- Yes, for Christians the columbine symbolizes the Holy Spirit while the Iris is a symbol for the Virgin Mary.(4 votes)
- When you look very closely around Christs head it seems as if there is a halo around his head. Am I just imagining it or is it there?(2 votes)
- It talks about how Christ is staring directly at us. It doesnt seem so to me.He seems to be looking off to the right. 5:25(1 vote)
- to add : it was, as I had read, part of the instructions especially from Leonardo da Vinci that perspective and proportion for a painter, craftsman of painting, was to learn how the painting would be seen for the viewer. So, how the painter depicted his (or her) composition should be based on that position of how the image would be displayed. In other words, high on a wall or alter or at eye level. Perspective was new and the placement of such a image would determine, if it made sense or not , if it were in perfect perspective but did not meet the placement of where that perspective was: upwards or at eye-level. Hope that makes sense?(1 vote)
- mary looks blue!!
can anyone explain it?(1 vote)
Video transcript
(piano music) Beth: When you walk into the gallery, this painting just stands out. It almost seems to glow. Steven: The hands are unbelievable. Beth: He does seem particularly
interested in hands. We follow them from the figure of Joseph holding out his hands,
looking questioning, and then the delicate way that Mary holds up Christ's left hand, and then the figure of the first Magi, whose hands are in prayer as
he worships the Christ Child. Steven: The hands continue
in the frieze of figures. We see the second Magi, whose hand is in front of his breast. His thumb is up; the fingers
are slightly separated, and the light is coming from behind. It creates this kind of transparency, that's really extraordinary. Beth: Yeah, that really seems like skin. Steven: Doesn't it? Steven: Look at the way
we can see the light on his palm, between his fingers. Beth: Yeah; and at his fingertips. Steven: It seems so three-dimensional. It's as if we could walk into this space, and shake that hand, and
we'd feel its muscle; we'd feel his grip. Beth: And we feel his grip, actually, on the goblet that he's about
to offer to the Christ Child. Steven: Beyond that,
there's the assistant, who's holding up that goblet, and just over his head is another hand that holds the third gift, that's to be given by the third king, but that hand, where the
fingers are facing up, and there the light is so subtle, because the entire hand is in shadow. The light is a tour de force, and I think it's in many ways unprecedented in the history of painting. Everything seems so physical and actual. Even the spiritual here
is made really present. The story that's being
told is a common one. The star of Bethlehem leads
three kings from the east, to pay homage to the newly-born Christ. It really speaks of the
way the Earthly power, even the power of kings, is humbled before the power of God. The wealth of the king's crown sits neglected against that rock. He's far more interested in Christ and in his devotion to the divine than that worldly wealth,
that worldly power, but it's so interesting,
because Christ, in Mary's lap, is not actually paying
attention to the king. Christ stares out directly at us, so if we were kneeling in a church, directly before this altar, we would be returning Christ's gaze, and Christ would in turn be blessing us, and so there really is
this wonderful sense of intimacy and directness here. Beth: It seems like Hugo van der Goes is combing all of these elements of the northern Renaissance, and then adding something
that's very much his own. Steven: The intensity of the detail makes everything feel actually concrete, as if it's more than just having volume; that it is actual in the
world, in some vivid way. Look at the irises for
instance, on the left, or the columbines on the right. The fur of the crown,
or any of the brocade, or just the enormous number
of details throughout. But none of it feels crowded. There's a kind of elegance and a kind of spareness that makes us see these
elements as distinct. Beth: One famous art historian said that Hugo van der Goes' figures
have a sense of stage presence. That really makes sense to me. The figures all have a
sense of individuality, but in a way that has a
kind of charisma to it, where we're drawn to them
and looking at their faces, and wondering what they're thinking. Steven: There's a sense
of a theatricality here that draws us in and makes us want to be part of this
scene of intense worship. (piano music)