Main content
Europe 1300 - 1800
Course: Europe 1300 - 1800 > Unit 12
Lesson 1: British art in the eighteenth century- Hogarth, A Rake's Progress
- William Hogarth, Marriage A-la-Mode (including Tête à Tête)
- Hogarth, Marriage a la Mode
- Thomas Gainsborough, Mr. and Mrs. Andrews
- Wright of Derby, A Philosopher Lecturing on the Orrery
- Reynolds, Lady Cockburn and Her Three Eldest Sons
- Sir Joshua Reynolds, Mrs. Siddons as the Tragic Muse
- Sir Joshua Reynolds, Portrait of Syacust Ukah
- Wren, Saint Paul's Cathedral
- Room: 1650-1730
- Room: 1730-1765
- Room: 1760-1780
- Room: 1780-1810
- Wedgwood factory, The Pegasus Vase
- Mary Delany and cut flowers
- A map of Kolkata in 1785
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Room: 1760-1780
This video brought to you by Tate.org.uk
Curator Greg Sullivan explores the period 1760-1780.
Learn more about the art featured in this video:
- Sir Joshua Reynolds, Colonel Acland and Lord Sydney: The Archers, 1769
- Benjamin West, Pylades and Orestes Brought as Victims before Iphigenia, 1766
- Nathaniel Hone, Sketch for ‘The Conjuror’. 1775. Created by Tate.
Curator Greg Sullivan explores the period 1760-1780.
Learn more about the art featured in this video:
- Sir Joshua Reynolds, Colonel Acland and Lord Sydney: The Archers, 1769
- Benjamin West, Pylades and Orestes Brought as Victims before Iphigenia, 1766
- Nathaniel Hone, Sketch for ‘The Conjuror’. 1775. Created by Tate.
Want to join the conversation?
- - in the background, is that a child dressed as Henry VIII? 1:23(6 votes)
- Great spot, Milena! You're absolutely right -- that's a painting by Joshua Reynolds called Master Crewe as Henry VIII, from about 1775. You can take a closer look at it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Crewe,_2nd_Baron_Crewe#/media/File:Master_Crewe_by_Joshua_Reynolds.jpg(5 votes)
- What were the reasons given as to why Hone's "Sketch for 'The Conjuror'" was rejected by the Royal Academy? Would love to understand who made up the Royal Academy and what made them an authority on the arts.(2 votes)
- Hone's painting was rejected by the Royal Academy because its aim was to lampoon the Academy's president, Joshua Reynolds, and a female member named Angelica Kauffman (allegedly Reynolds' former lover). The conjuror is Reynolds, and the girl leaning on his knee is Kauffman.
The group of naked figures cavorting and waving paintbrushes and palettes in the top-left corner caused a bit of a commotion, too... You can read more about it all here: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/hone-sketch-for-the-conjuror-t00938/text-summary(4 votes)
- Why did Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood hate Joshua Reynolds and call him "Sir Sloshua"?(2 votes)
- It was all about artistic freedom.
Joshua Reynolds was the president of the Royal Academy, and he had a great deal of power in setting the standards for what a "good painting" should be. But the members of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood didn't want to paint by his rules. The PRB thought that Reynolds' (and his followers') colors were dark and dreary; they thought that Reynolds' compositions were mannered and unnatural, and they thought that Reynolds' painting technique was sloppy -- he "sloshed" the paint onto the canvas, they seemed to be saying with the name they gave him. Instead, the PRB preferred vivid colors, lots of light, a naturalistic/realistic approach, and careful, detailed brushwork. In other words, they preferred to paint by their own rules.(2 votes)
Video transcript
We’re here in the 1760 to 1780 room which is a brief period, 20 years, and it’s a small room but its of vital significance in the history British Art and this is because 1768 was the foundation of the Royal Academy. The room is dominated, just like the art world of the period was, by Sir Joshua Reynolds whose extraordinary large paintings you can see here of the Montgomery sisters with the ‘Term of Hymen’ and behind us here ‘the Archers’. Reynolds was essentially a society portraitist, which meant that he painted people faces for money. But for Reynolds there was a way of elevating his art which was by referencing the history of art and each of the paintings in this room use some kind of a motif, usually by referencing the Old Masters. In this painting, you can see a good deal of what made Reynolds the popular and great artist that he was at the time. It’s a painting on a very, very grand scale although it is just a portrait of two young aristocrats Colonel Acland and Lord Sydney, engaged in a hunt leaving a trail of dead behind them as they go. But this is no naturalistic scene this is a Renaissance hunt scene essentially referencing Titian and Frans Snyders. It’s a way of elevating what is a simple portrait to a level of grand style painting. Not everybody took Reynolds view that portraiture elevated to a new level by historical references was enough if you are going to do intellectual painting, Benjamin West thought, then you really needed to do intellectual painting and subjects like this which are almost impenetrable to modernise are exactly the sort of thing that they had in mind. West painted this painting in 1760 and it’s a subject from Euripides in which Iphigenia, who’s the priestess of Diana here, is about to pronounce a sentence of death on these two guys here, who are Pylades and Orestes, for their attempt to steal this statue up here. And what Iphigenia is about to find out is that Orestes is her long lost brother and although it ends well and these two are let off, essentially the person whose looking at this in the 18th century who has read their Euripides, is supposed to know and get that feeling of that terrible moment at which Iphigenia may just have sentenced her brother to death. If for Benjamin West the problem with Joshua Reynolds was that he simply wasn’t intellectual enough for another painter, Nathaniel Hone there was a sense in which Reynold’s method was essentially a form of trickery and in this painting, 'The Conjurer' Nathaniel Hone paints an old figure, who’s clearly meant to represent Reynolds who’s basically magicking an oil painting out of old Master Brint and if you look very closely we can actually see that this is the composition that was used on the Montgomery sisters decorating the ‘Term of Hymen’ over on that wall there. There was something of a scandal in this and not surprisingly the painting wasn’t accepted for exhibition at the Royal Academy.