Main content
Europe 1300 - 1800
Course: Europe 1300 - 1800 > Unit 9
Lesson 2: Italy- Restoring ancient sculpture in Baroque Rome
- Bernini, Pluto and Proserpina
- Bernini, David
- Bernini, David
- Bernini, David
- Bernini, Apollo and Daphne
- Gian Lorenzo Bernini, Baldacchino
- Bernini, Bust of Medusa
- Bernini, Ecstasy of Saint Teresa
- Bernini, Ecstasy of Saint Teresa
- Bernini, Ecstasy of Saint Teresa
- Gian Lorenzo Bernini, Cathedra Petri (Chair of St. Peter)
- Bernini, Saint Peter's Square
- Bernini, Sant'Andrea al Quirinale
- Geometry and motion in Borromini's San Carlo
- Carracci, Christ Appearing to Saint Peter on the Appian Way
- Caravaggio, Narcissus at the Source
- Caravaggio, Calling of Saint Matthew
- Caravaggio, Calling of St. Matthew
- Caravaggio, The Conversion of St. Paul (or The Conversion of Saul)
- Caravaggio, Crucifixion of Saint Peter
- Caravaggio, Supper at Emmaus
- Caravaggio, Deposition
- Caravaggio, Saint John the Baptist in the Wilderness
- Caravaggio, The Flagellation of Christ
- Caravaggio, Death of the Virgin
- Caravaggio and Caravaggisti in 17th-Century Europe
- Reni, Aurora
- Gentileschi, Judith Slaying Holofernes
- Gentileschi, Judith and Holofernes
- Gentileschi, Judith and Her Maidservant with the Head of Holofernes
- Gentileschi, Conversion of the Magdalene
- Elisabetta Sirani, Portia Wounding her Thigh
- Guercino, Saint Luke Displaying a Painting of the Virgin
- Il Gesù, including Triumph of the Name of Jesus ceiling fresco
- Pozzo, Saint Ignatius Chapel, Il Gesù
- Pozzo, Glorification of Saint Ignatius, Sant'Ignazio
- The altar tabernacle, Pauline Chapel, Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome
- Pierre Le Gros the Younger, Stanislas Kostka on his Deathbed
- Baroque art in Italy
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Caravaggio, Crucifixion of Saint Peter
Caravaggio, Crucifixion of St. Peter, oil on canvas, 1601 (Santa Maria del Popolo, Rome) Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris, Dr. Steven Zucker. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why was he crucified upside down?(19 votes)
- Peter asked that his cross be inverted because he did not feel he was worthy to be crucified in the same manner as Jesus.(38 votes)
- You don't see people besides Jesus on crucifixes these days. When did people decide that the cross should only be associated with Jesus?(12 votes)
- The cross was a means of execution for the worst of criminals. It was very shameful for someone to die on a cross. In fact, apparently, the worst of insults was to call someone a "crucified one".
As a result, people thought very little of anyone who died on a cross. The Bible talks about Jesus, though God, humbled himself to take the form of a servant and die on the cross. So the cross took on a different meaning in one way because it was the means for Jesus to die.
According to tradition, Peter the apostle was also crucified, and being an important part of Church history, has ended up in art as well.(19 votes)
- How did the other apostles die? In what order?(4 votes)
- Peter is rendered very life like. I was admiring how the artist seemed to have gotten the pain lines between his brows right! In this light I found it odd that there is no blood on Peter's feet nor hands. Is there a reason why the artist would leave out the blood?(5 votes)
- It would have probably been too graphic and explicit. The main intent was to portray the saint and the moments before his death, the fact he's nailed to a cross was already violent enough. It was already crude and unsettling enough (if it was meant to inspire a sense of awe in the viewers). I don't think it would have been accepted, had it been that realistic.(4 votes)
- Is Peter still alive? I can't tell if his cross is being pushed up or taken down.(0 votes)
- If you look at his body and expression I think you will find clear signs that he is alive. Had he been dead and in the process of being taken down, gravity would have worked on the dying body and made him lay flat against the cross. Here he is with a raised neck and a raised shoulder. The expression of his face is one of pain. Most likely the frown would have been relaxed if he were dead. His eyes seem alert whereas a dead person has filmed over eyes (which may not have been visible in the painting.)(7 votes)
- When and why did the Romans stop crucifying people?(3 votes)
- The Roman Empire collapsed. However, crucifixions didn't stop with the destruction of the Roman Empire, nearly every society since has used crucifixion against Christians (Japan, China, even the Germans in concentration camps used crucifixion).
America has used equally brutal measures to kill Muslims and American Indians, so unfortunately, people torturing people to death did not stop with the end of the Roman Empire.(4 votes)
- Why Christianity and polytheistic Graeco-Roman culture could not coexist? Why polytheistic Romans persecuted monotheistic ones, and vice versa when Christianity "won"? Was it for political or other reasons? Many religions coexist today. Why was this not the thing in the past? Other societies seemed to be more tolerant: Hinduism and Buddhism, the mythology of Hittites and mythology of the conquered nations.(2 votes)
- Maybe the polytheistic religions of Rome and Greece had lost their appeal to the common people of the empire. That happened in China when Confucianism (the religion of the emperor) and Taoism (the religion of the educated) ceased to work for the common people, and the polytheistic folk religions just didn't help. Buddhism, from India, swept the empire, and later gained sanction from the emperor. I suspect something like that may have happened in Europe, too.(2 votes)
- The painting of the Crucifixion of Saint Peter looks so realisitc it almost
looks like it's going to come to life at any moment like all of Caravaggio's paintings,
did Caravaggio use water color for this?Is that why his paintings make it look so real?(1 vote)- No, Caravaggio did not use watercolours for this painting. This painting was made with oil paints on canvas. :)(1 vote)
- These guys seem like huge baroque fans/nerds, they could hardly let the other speak for their oohing and aahing at the piece!(1 vote)
- I don't think she finished speaking but Dr. Harris mentioned that Caravaggio grabbed a guy but from where? Out on the street? Was it someone he knew?(1 vote)
Video transcript
SPEAKER 1: We're in
Santa Maria del Popolo. SPEAKER 2: In Rome. SPEAKER 1: Looking at one
of the great Caravaggios of the Baroque. SPEAKER 2: This may actually
be my favorite Caravaggio, although I think I said about
the last Caravaggio we did. SPEAKER 1: You may have. This is the "Crucifixion
of St. Peter." You know, we talk about the
diagonals of the Baroque and the sense of action
in the momentary. But Caravaggio just makes
that seem so pedestrian. It's such an activated, complex
set of movements and weights. SPEAKER 2: Counter-movements. SPEAKER 1: And yes. And gravity plays
this intense role. SPEAKER 2: Very, very,
very powerful feeling of the pull of gravity. But what gets me is Peter. Caravaggio went out onto
the street and got a guy. SPEAKER 1: He's a real and
powerful, intense figure. And he looks really crabby,
just the way Peter should be. Now, the story of
course is that Peter-- SPEAKER 2: He asked
to be crucified not the way that Christ did. SPEAKER 1: That's right. So upside-down. SPEAKER 2: So they're turning
the cross upside-down, right? Look at him. He looks poor and kind of messy. SPEAKER 1: Not idealized at all. SPEAKER 2: No. SPEAKER 1: This is
in such contrast to the pomp and ceremony. SPEAKER 2: He's a guy
hanging out in a bar in Rome. SPEAKER 1: Well,
that's what Caravaggio is so well known for. It's all the pomp
and ceremony of Rome, of the Catholic Church is
here turned on its head by Caravaggio. Think about this in contrast
to the medieval traditions where there's no sense of
gravity, no sense of weight, no sense of physicality. I mean, we're really
seeing the ramifications of the Renaissance, but the
brought into the Baroque era with a kind of intense
emotionalism and physicality that even puts the
Renaissance to shame. SPEAKER 2: Yeah. Oh, and shoved in your face. The guy who's
lifting the cross , he's got all the way under it
and is hoisting it with his back. We see his butt in our face. We see his legs, his dirty feet. SPEAKER 1: That's right. And this notion of really
pushing out past the picture plane into our face
is absolutely-- SPEAKER 2: Right. Into the space-- into our space. SPEAKER 1: And look at
the diagonal of Peter has his feet comes towards us. SPEAKER 2: Yeah. SPEAKER 1: You're
absolutely right. It breaks out into our world. SPEAKER 2: Right. And in fact, the cross as
it moves out into our space by his feet, gives us a very
close up view of the nails. There's a kind way that it
gets to you in your body so that you almost
go "ugh, agh." SPEAKER 1: Yeah. There's all this
tension, actually. SPEAKER 2: You can feel that. The nail through his hands
is all very, very real and descriptive. And the way that there's
that black background. SPEAKER 1: Because
light is really emphasizing what
you're talking about. They way in which
the knees protrude, the way in which the body
is sort of pushed forward. All of that is highly
controlled by the way that the light is played here. SPEAKER 2: And on his
abdomen and his knees, they make his body
look very normal. Like it's a regular man's body. So different than
the kinds of bodies we're used to seeing
in the Renaissance. SPEAKER 1: It's true, although
there is a kind of heroicism here in terms of its
mass and its strength. But it's only
expressed through-- SPEAKER 2: Belied a little bit
by the face though, I think, which looks so vulnerable. SPEAKER 1: It's true. There is this kind of incredible
tension, because you're right. All the forces of
nature play here. And we're not quite sure if
that rope is strong enough. We're not quite sure if
those men are strong enough. It may just fall. SPEAKER 2: It may. The whole thing could
collapse at any second. SPEAKER 1: Absolutely. There's this kind of sense of
transience in the momentary. SPEAKER 2: And sort of
human frailty, you know. SPEAKER 1: That's right. In a sense,
Caravaggio's brilliance is to be able to create this
sense of newness and freshness, and as if this hadn't been
rehearsed hundreds of times in paintings for
hundreds of years. SPEAKER 2: I know, but
no one did it like this. SPEAKER 1: It's as if
it's the first time. SPEAKER 2: Yeah.