Main content
Global cultures 1980–now
Course: Global cultures 1980–now > Unit 1
Lesson 8: Revisiting histories- Christian Boltanski, Personnes, 2010
- Betye Saar, Liberation of Aunt Jemima
- Reflecting on "We the People"
- Kara Walker, Darkytown Rebellion
- Walker, Darkytown Rebellion
- Kara Walker on the dark side of imagination
- Romance novels and slave narratives: Kara Walker imagines herself in a book
- Kara Walker, "A Subtlety, or the Marvelous Sugar Baby"
- Turning Uncle Tom's Cabin upside down, Alison Saar's Topsy and the Golden Fleece
- An interview with Kerry James Marshall about his series Mementos
- Speaking to past and present, Clarissa Rizal’s Resilience Robe
- Tenzing Rigdol, Pin drop silence: Eleven-headed Avalokiteshvara
- An unflinching memorial to civil rights martyrs, Thornton Dial's Blood and Meat
- Titus Kaphar, The Cost of Removal
- Wendy Red Star, 1880 Crow Peace Delegation
- Yee I-Lann, Picturing Power #6…
- Superman, World War II, and Japanese-American experience (Roger Shimomura, Diary: December 12, 1941)
- Fred Wilson’s museum interventions
- Ken Gonzales-Day, Erased Lynching Series
- History and deception: Kenseth Armstead’s Surrender Yorktown 1781
- Carrie Mae Weems on her series "From Here I Saw What Happened and I Cried"
- Lam Tung Pang on "A Day of Two Suns (2019)"
- Abdoulaye Ndoye, Ahmed Baba
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
History and deception: Kenseth Armstead’s Surrender Yorktown 1781
Kenseth Armstead discusses his drawing, "Surrender Yorktown 1781," highlighting the importance of truth in art. He critiques the original painting for its historical inaccuracies, like dancing slaves and a lush landscape post-battle. Armstead's version leaves an empty space, inviting viewers to populate it with a truer history.
Video transcript
(soft piano music) - [Interviewer] I'm in the Newark Museum with Kenseth Armstead, looking
at Surrender Yorktown 1781. This is not a painting. It's a drawing. And, I see your hand all over it. - [Kenseth] The vast majority
of history paintings, you can't see the brushstrokes. So, in my rendition of history, you can see the hand of the artist. - But then what does it
mean to take that genre, to take history painting,
and to remake it, in the 21st century? To take its grand scale, but
to transform it completely. This is pencil, this is graphite. - The King of France at the
time of the American Revolution had invested his ships
and capital, literal cash, in our American Revolution. And he wanted a memento of how it is that the American Revolution ended with the British defeated. This, as a Frenchman,
made him extremely happy. So he commissioned Blarenberghe to make a painting called
Surrender Yorktown 1781. And what he did was
piece together a fantasy of the British surrendering at Yorktown that would satisfy this one patron who needed a memento of his investment in the American Revolution. The original painting by Blarenberghe it has in it dancing slaves. I doubt very seriously
slaves were at the moment of the American Revolution dancing since they weren't being freed. It has in it landed gentry
and it has a landscape that's lush and beautiful, which wouldn't actually be realistic after a battle had just concluded. This is the idea of the New World from somebody who's a
fantasist about the New World. They've never been, the King
of France has never been, the painter's never been,
Blarenberghe makes a painting that will satisfy the patron, but doesn't have that
much to do with history. - There are two kinds of lies at work. There's the lie of illusionism. We're looking at a flat
canvas, or in this case, a flat piece of paper. And yet, we have this vast landscape that stretches out before us. But there's another lie, which is the history. Which is the story that's being told. And you've treated this in
a completely unexpected way. Instead of trying to imagine what that battlefield looked
like populated, you've removed. - I started out looking
at Blarenberghe's work and I wanted to be honest about
it and really work with it. As I started to compose it, I'm like, "Well that's fiction and that's fiction." - So far we've mostly
discussed what you've removed. How you've stepped away from
the illusionistic traditions of history painting and
from their falsehoods. But what you have created is
this majestic empty space. The aftermath of a terrible battle where hundreds of people died. - The first person to die
in the American Revolution is a descendant of Africans. The war would not end
without the participation of Africans, specifically
James Armistead Lafayette. But also the 20% of Washington's troops. And the French who
allowed us the financing and the ships to keep
Cornwallis cordoned off so he couldn't leave by ship. So my work allows a entry point to explore that all of the histories
that we are given are needing work. They're all incomplete. When people look at this work in depth they'll see layer upon
layer of mark making. Making a history painting
is not a passive act, it's a proactive act. You have to go and shape it. - You've given us a stage set, you've given us an open space. You've given us an arena
that we can repopulate with a truer history.