Main content
Big History Project
Course: Big History Project > Unit 2
Lesson 2: How Did Our Understanding of the Universe Change? | 2.1- ACTIVITY: DQ Notebook 2.1
- WATCH: Why Cosmic Evolution Matters
- READ: Dr. Wu and the Left-Handed Universe – Graphic Biography
- READ: Claudius Ptolemy
- READ: Nicolaus Copernicus
- READ: Galileo Galilei
- READ: Isaac Newton
- READ: Henrietta Leavitt
- READ: Edwin Hubble
- READ: Standing on the Shoulders of Invisible Giants
- READ: The Missing Link? — The Maragha Observatory
- Quiz: How Did Our Understanding of the Universe Change?
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
READ: Henrietta Leavitt
Measuring Distance in the Universe
By Cynthia Stokes Brown
Henrietta Leavitt discovered the relationship between the intrinsic brightness of a variable star and the time it took to vary in brightness, making it possible for others to estimate the distance of these faraway stars, conclude that additional galaxies exist, and begin mapping the Universe.
Early life and education
Henrietta Swan Leavitt was a minister’s daughter whose family moved frequently. When she was about 14, the family moved to Cleveland, Ohio, and in 1885 Leavitt enrolled in Oberlin College to prepare for the strict entrance requirements of the college she really wanted to attend — the Society for Collegiate Instruction of Women, later known as Radcliffe College (now part of Harvard University), in Cambridge, Massachusetts – a dream she achieved at age 20. She discovered her calling in her senior year when she took a course in astronomy.
At the Harvard College Observatory
Leavitt liked astronomy so much that after graduation she became a volunteer at the Harvard College Observatory as a “computer.” This was the name used for women who examined tiny dots on time-exposed photographs of the night sky and then measured, calculated, and recorded their observations in ledger books. Eventually, in 1902, Leavitt was hired at 30 cents an hour; she continued to work at the observatory for the remaining 19 years of her life. Leavitt took a special interest in the Magellanic Clouds, a pair of luminous hazes now known to be irregular galaxies, the nearest ones to our Milky Way. At the time, no one knew what the clouds were. Since the Magellanic Clouds are only visible in the southern hemisphere, Leavitt could not see them directly. She could merely look at photographic plates taken at Harvard’s auxiliary observatory, in Arequipa, Peru, and sent to Cambridge by ship around the tip of South America.
Using Cepheid variables
One of Leavitt’s jobs was to examine the variable stars, which, unlike most stars, vary in brightness because of fluctuations within themselves. In the course of her work, Leavitt discovered 2,400 new variable stars, half the known ones in her day. A certain group of variable stars, later called Cepheid variables, fluctuate in brightness (luminosity) in a regular pattern called their “period.” This period ranges from about one day to nearly four months.
By comparing thousands of photographic plates, Leavitt discovered a direct correlation between the time it takes for a Cepheid variable to go from bright to dim and back to bright, and how bright the star actually is (its “intrinsic brightness”). The longer the period of fluctuation, the brighter the star. This meant that even though a star might appear extremely dim, if it had a long period it must actually be extremely large; it appeared dim only because it was extremely far away. By calculating how bright it appeared from Earth and comparing this to its intrinsic brightness, one could estimate how much of the star’s light had been lost while reaching Earth, and how far away the star actually was.
Leavitt published her first paper on the period-luminosity correlation in 1908. Four years after that, she published a table of the periods of 25 Cepheid variables. Nine years later, in 1921, she died of cancer at age 53 in Cambridge.
Leavitt’s Legacy
Before Leavitt established the period-luminosity relationship, astronomers could determine cosmic distances out only about 100 light years. Using her insights, astronomers were able to estimate the Magellanic Clouds to be in the range of 100,000 light years from Earth — much further than anyone had imagined — meaning they could not be within the Milky Way galaxy.
The largest telescope then in existence opened in 1904 at Mount Wilson, near Los Angeles, California. In 1919, the astronomer Edwin Hubble took a job there, after finishing his PhD in astronomy at the University of Chicago. Using the Mount Wilson telescope and building on Leavitt’s work, Hubble located Cepheid variables so far away that they conclusively established the presence of other galaxies. By 1925, most astronomers agreed that our galaxy is one among a multitude — a small outpost in a Universe full of galaxies.
Leavitt initially worked under a director of the Harvard College Observatory who did not encourage theorizing but preferred only to accumulate data. A later director even tried to take some of the credit for her work after her death. Now, however, Leavitt is recognized as a key contributor to our understanding of the size of the Universe.
A modest life
Leavitt never married. She gradually became deaf, starting with an illness when she was a young adult. She was buried in Cambridge in the family plot, near the graves of Henry and William James. Her total estate was appraised at $314.91. In her obituary, a senior colleague wrote: “[She] was possessed of a nature so full of sunshine that, to her, all of life became beautified and full of meaning.”
Want to join the conversation?
- What a wonderful woman, she deserves more credit.
I agree that if it wasn't because of her researches, we may or may have not gotten enough information for knowing about space and more specifically; stars.(5 votes) - humans are humans and that is that.(2 votes)
- Correct! And humans are a type of ape so we are in fact just humans.(1 vote)
- How long does our Sun's "period" lasts?(1 vote)
- The Sun is not a cepheid variable type star.(2 votes)
- Who is the director who tried to steal credit for her work? Was it Shapley?(1 vote)