Main content
Europe 1800 - 1900
Klimt, Death and Life
Gustav Klimt, Death and Life, 1910, reworked 1915, oil on canvas, 178 x 198 cm (Leopold Museum, Vienna). Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- what are the paintings shown atand 2:32? 2:38(1 vote)
- Its a Redon and a Khnopff, we always list that information at the end of the video.(5 votes)
- Is it plausible that perhaps the "crazed woman" with her eyes open is welcoming death? Perhaps is taking her own life or is suicidal and is thus "excited"?(3 votes)
- Is there more elaboration on the idea of how Freud's theory of consciousness plays into factor?(1 vote)
- There is probably a LOT on that topic, but just not here in the Art History course.(1 vote)
- I interpret the dark crosses on death's attire differently. They are not symbols of redemption and an afterlife, but a critique of Christian religion on the part of the artist as being the agent of death in his society, associating Christianity of his time and place with the negativity of death. As in, "here comes the church, prepare to die."(1 vote)
Video transcript
DR. BETH HARRIS: We're in
the Leopold Museum in Vienna, and we're looking at Gustav
Klimt's "Death and Life." DR. STEVEN ZUCKER: Klimt is
taking older traditional scenes and reworking them
and making them wildly contemporary,
wildly modern. DR. BETH HARRIS:
This is loosely based on the subject of
the dance of Death, which is a medieval subject
showing death coming to people of all ranks, the
idea that Death comes to everyone, whether you're
a peasant, or a priest, or a prince. Usually Death holds an
hourglass or a scythe. But here, and I think
this is very unusual, Death holds a club and
looks much more dangerous and menacing. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER: This skull
is looking towards life eagerly. And when I say
life, I'm referring to this accumulation,
this almost architecture of human bodies, old
and young and newborn. DR. BETH HARRIS: There's a sense
of generations and generations of human beings who have
been taken by Death. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER: If you
look at the overlapping of those bodies, there really
is a sense of succession, of movement forward in time,
but not towards anything. DR. BETH HARRIS: They
do seem swept along, as though in a dream. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER:
That idea of their eyes closed, of the dream, I
think is really important. This notion of the subconscious
or of the dream state was something that was being
developed by Freud in Vienna at this time. We should say that there are two
exceptions to those eyes being closed. One is the infant, and there
is a kind of instinctual aspect there. This is not yet a
learned consciousness. And the other eyes
that are open are those of the young woman
on the extreme left. She seems almost crazed,
almost delusional. DR. BETH HARRIS: To me, it
reads like Death on one side and pleasure or
sensuality on the other. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER: There
is a real mirroring, and I think both
figures are intensified because of the other. Their hands are even
somewhat together. DR. BETH HARRIS: That's right. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER:
One holding the club, one clutching her breast. DR. BETH HARRIS: We
see on both sides that characteristic
decorative patterning that we associate with
Gustav Klimt so much. On the side of death, we see
very dark colors and the shape of a cross, clearly an allusion
to the church and maybe the resurrection or afterlife. On the right, much brighter
colors, shapes that suggest flowers, decorative patterns
that suggest renewal. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER:
That pattern, it really seems to flatten
the entire image. DR. BETH HARRIS: In
Europe at this time, we see an interest in the
interior, in dream states, in a removal from
the everyday world, a kind of reaction
against the materialism and quick pace of
modern industrial life. This interest in
instinctive drives has particular
significance in Vienna even more than the symbolist
movements in other countries at this time. DR. STEVEN ZUCKER:
It does seem to me to be a really successful
solution to a problem that artists had been grappling
with for some time, which is, how do you rescue the
profound qualities that art had been able to achieve in history,
without resorting to history painting or the traditional
modes that had been so worn out by the end of the 19th century? Was it possible to find
a new arena to explore? And they did, but that
arena was an interior one.