If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

How the Impressionists got their name

Claude Monet, Boulevard des Capucines, 1873-74, oil on canvas, 80.3 x 60.3 cm (Nelson Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, Missouri)

The First Impressionist Exhibition, 1874

Although the idea originated with Claude Monet, Degas is largely responsible for organizing the very first Impressionist exhibition. After much debate, the artists—including Degas, Monet, Renoir, Morisot, Pissarro, Sisley, Boudin, and even the young Cézanne—along with many other lesser-known figures, chose to call themselves the Société Anonyme des Artistes. This group included painters, sculptors, printmakers, and others.
The exhibition opened in Paris on April 15, 1874. It was held at 35 Boulevard des Capucines, on the top floor and former studio of the photographer, Gaspard-Félix Tournachon, better known as Nadar. He was a friend of several of the artists and well-known for his portraits of the Parisian literati.
35 Boulevard des Capucines, workshop of Nadar and location of the first Impressionist exhibition in 1874

Serious criticism or Tongue-In-Cheek?

Although the first Impressionist exhibition was well attended, the critics were merciless. Trained to expect the polished illusions of the Salon painters, they were shocked by the raw, unblended, ill-defined paint used by Degas, Renoir, Monet and company. The satirical magazine, Le Charivari published an account of a visit with Joseph Vincent, an accomplished and conservative painter:
Upon entering the first room, Joseph Vincent received an initial shock in front of the Dancer by M. Renoir. 
'What a pity,' he said to me, 'that the painter, who has a certain understanding of color, doesn't draw better; his dancer's legs are as cottony as the gauze of her skirts.'...
Unfortunately, I was imprudent enough to leave him [Joseph Vincent] in front of the "Boulevard des Capucines," by [Monet]. 
'Ah-ha! he sneered.... Is that brilliant enough, now!' 'There's impression, or I don't know what it means.' 'Only be so good as to tell me what those innumerable black tongue-lickings in the lower part of the picture represent?' 
'Why, those are people walking along,' I replied. 
'Then do I look like that when I'm walking along the Boulevard Capucines?' 'Blood and Thunder!' 'So you're making fun of me!' '...What does that painting depict?' 'Look at the Catalogue.' 'Impression Sunrise.' 'Impression--I was certain of it. I was just telling myself that, since I was impressed, there had to be some impression in it...and what freedom, what ease of workmanship! Wallpaper in its embryonic state is more finished than that seascape!'"*
Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1872, oil on canvas, 48 x 63 cm (Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris)
And on it goes, ever more sarcastically. The article was titled, "Exhibition of the Impressionists," and the term stuck. From then on, these artists were called Impressionists.
Essay by Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker
*Linda Nochlin, Impressionism and Post-Impressionism, 1874-1904: Sources and Documents (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966), pp. 10-13.

Additional resources

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user gerald.
    Why did Monet use the word impression in title:Impression, Sunrise.
    (6 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • aqualine tree style avatar for user David Alexander
      this was explained in the article that precedes this one, an "impression" was a sketch or quickly done piece that was intended to act as an aid to the memory when doing the finished painting that followed. There was already a category in existence for what they did, and what the impressionists produced looked like things from that category. The difference, at least in this case, was that they considered the paintings as finished works.
      (8 votes)
  • starky tree style avatar for user Ines Serrano
    The article mentions that the critical reception of the first Impressionist exhibition was overwhelmingly negative. Were there any positive reviews? If so, what kind of aspects did those reviews highlight, and what kinds of people wrote them?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • duskpin seedling style avatar for user Layla Asano Riddle
    How come we can't draw just read??
    (0 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Robert Woolley
    Did the impressionists signal the end of the government controlled Salons or did they continue? For how long?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • starky sapling style avatar for user LaraCaoimhe
      No, not at all. As said, the Impressionists were not well received. There was a lot of controversy caused by their work and because of the bad press they found it hard to sell. The impressionists only held eight exhibitions altogether. These were between 1874 and 1886. The Salon kept thriving, its popularity only beginning to dwindle around 1890- after the last impressionism exhibition, so seemingly its downfall was unrelated to them.
      (1 vote)