Main content
For teachers
Course: For teachers > Unit 2
Lesson 4: Go deeper: understanding museums- Looking at Art Museums
- Artists in and against the museum
- Remake the Met
- Looting, collecting, and exhibiting: the Bubon bronzes
- From tomb to museum: the story of the Sarpedon Krater
- Nazi looting: Egon Schiele's Portrait of Wally
- Paikea at the American Museum of Natural History
- The Looting of Cambodian Antiquities
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
The Looting of Cambodian Antiquities
The looting of ancient Cambodian antiquities from Prasat Chen, the 10th century the Khmer capital at Koh Ker
ARCHES: At Rist Cultural Heritage Education Series
Speakers: Terressa Davis and Steven Zucker. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why is it dangerous to place the statues in the temple and to be put in the museum?(2 votes)
- If someone found Sotheby cut of feet, then where are the arms?(1 vote)
- The statues are about 1,000 years old, and the city where they were on display had been uninhabited for centuries. Arms on statues, even modern ones, need more support than is offered by the stone that they're made of. On these statues, the arms probably fell off long, long ago. By the time the looters cut them from their bases in the 1970s, those arms had sunk into the dirt or disintegrated from being on the ground.(2 votes)
Video transcript
(classical music) - [Steven] I'm sitting with Tess Davis, the executive director of
the Antiquities Coalition. We wanna talk about looting in Cambodia. - [Tess] The illicit antiquities
trade affects few countries more than the South East
Asian the nation of Cambodia. Which was the heart of
the ancient Khmer Empire. One of the most powerful
forces in South East Asia. And during the Angkorian period which was from the ninth
to the 15th century. This kingdom extended
far beyond Cambodia's current boundaries,
reaching into what is now Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, and even Burma. - [Steven] And they're probably best known for the extraordinarily
elaborate stone temples and cities that were built
most famously, Angkor Wat. - [Tess] The Khmer built
their capitol at Angkor and filled it with great
temples, reservoirs, stone roadways, and bridges. And the city had a
population in the millions. And it's crowning achievement,
the 12th century temple of Angkor Wat really rivals
the pyramids in scale. It's an amazing site. - [Steven] But we wanna
rewind a little bit, and go back in history
before Angkor Wat was built and look at a town in what
is now Northern Cambodia. What was briefly the capitol of Khmer. - [Tess] The site Koh
Ker was the 10th century capital of the Khmer Empire. And today while Angkor Wat is
welcoming throngs of tourist, Koh Ker is still off the beaten path. - [Steven] And we know from
early French colonial reports from the 19th and early 20th century, because it was so remote
it was largely untouched. - [Tess] Well, the site is
deep in the Cambodian jungle and it was only rediscovered by the outside world in the 1870s. The site was so pristine
that some of these early French explorers described it as a sort of outdoor museum given how
many statues survived intact. - [Steven] Fast forward to 1970s. - [Tess] Cambodian art started to flood the Western market in
the 1970s, 80s and 90s corresponding with the Killing
Fields, with the genocide, with the civil war, with the
foreign occupation by Vietnam. And were purchased by leading
auction houses, museums and collectors, no questions asked. In the case of the pieces from Koh Ker, you have these monumental
works among the most important pieces in
the Khmer canon of art. Appearing missing their feet, broken in pieces from a war zone. Yet they ended up in major collections. - [Steven] And the reason that
missing feet are important is that the feet are still attached to the pedestals at this site. - [Tess] In 2007,
conservator Simon Warrack was visiting the site of Koh Ker. And his eye was caught by
these two impressive pedestals with a pair of feet, the rest of the body cut off at the ankles. A work uncovered of what
seemed to be a fit on display at the Norton Simon
Museum of Art in Pasadena having been acquired in 1976. And two years later, French archeologist, Eric Bourdonneau confirmed
Warrack's research and then made an additional breakthrough that the missing companion
to the Nortorn Simon piece which matched the other
fragmented pedestal at Koh Ker, was at the opposite coast
of the United States. And not only that, it
was gracing the cover of Sotheby's Asia week catalog. The featured lot of the
event if not the year. - [Steven] Now Sotheby's
should've known better. They had been involved in
numerous repatriation claims. - [Tess] And in fact, we
know from court records that Sotheby's was on notice, that the statue was stolen property. The very expert hired to
appraise the piece warned them that is was quote definitely stolen and that they should
quote offer it back to the National Museum of Cambodia as a gesture of good will and to save everyone some embarrassment. Instead of heeding her
advice, Sotheby's put it on the cover of one of their
most prominent catalogs. With an estimated ticket price of around two to three million dollars. - [Steven] And they simply
call the sculpture athlete. But because we can match
the sculpture to the feet and the pedestal, we actually
have an identification. - [Tess] That's one of
the tragedies of looting. When cultural objects are removed
from their place of origin they lose so much of their meaning. For example, there was no
way identifying this statue or its mate at the Norton Simon Museum. But once matched to their pedestals, it became clear that
they were not warriors as they had been described
but they were the warriors Bhima and Duryodhana engaged
to this fight to the death from the Hindu epic, the Mahabharata. - [Steven] The sculptures themselves are beautiful and unusual. Most Khmer sculpture is relief sculpture. And so these are rarities because these are sculptures in the round. They're also enormous and
there's this sense of weight and muscularity but still
a fluidity that is one of the stunning
characteristics of Khmer art. - [Tess] Originally these
two figures would have been surrounded by other figures watching them in this three dimensional tableau. - [Steven] But when they're
looted and they show up isolated at an auction house or
in a museum display, we lose the interaction
between the figures, we lose their meaning. But not everybody behaved badly. - [Tess] The discovery of
the statue at Sotheby's had off a chain reaction,
resulting in a major story by the New York Times
and the federal lawsuit. And this uncovered a
number of statues that had all been looted around the same time, likely by the same people,
from the same temple at Koh Ker and yet, nonetheless made
their way into prominent American collections including the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Now, to the Met's credit as
soon as Cambodia presented them with evidence that these
statues were stolen, the Met stood up and did the
right thing and have since built a very strong relationship with the royal government of
Cambodia that has resulted in loans back and forth. - [Steven] And so although the Met lost this important object,
it is now the beneficiary of perhaps even more
important ongoing loans. One of the real remaining problems is that there is undoubtedly
a tremendous amount of important Cambodian art
in private collections. - [Tess] By far the bulk of
antiquities disappear into this black market and ending
up in private collections around the world and maybe one day they'll resurface, maybe they won't. I mean we're still seeing
looted art from World War Two that were stolen from Jewish
families throughout Europe, just resurfacing today. - [Steven] And so, you have
these gorgeous architectural monuments that are now defaced. - [Tess] Due to the trade
and art and antiquities we've lost countless
knowledge about these sites. But the losses go beyond that. At a site like Koh Ker, if
it's statuary were intact it would be a major tourist draw. And so it's having economic consequences for Cambodia to this day. There is clear evidance that
the looting and trafficking of blood antiquities in Cambodia
helped to prolong the war by continuing to finance hostilities. And unfortunately because of this demand for looted Cambodian
art, it's too dangerous to return these statues
to their original temples. They are going to be kept in the National Museum for safekeeping. And as I think also an important symbol of Cambodia's recovery after the war. This is not just about art. Like these statues so
many Cambodian families were broken up by the war and you have people
starting to return today and it's an important part of
this recovery to bring home these statues where they belong so, Cambodian children can
go and see these statues today and learn about their great past and hopefully to inspire
their equally great future. (classical music)