Main content
Art of the Americas to World War I
Course: Art of the Americas to World War I > Unit 5
Lesson 3: West- Juana Basilia Sitmelelene, Presentation Basket (Chumash)
- War Shirt (Upper Missouri River)
- The power of the bear and the story an American massacre
- Eastern Shoshone: Hide Painting of the Sun Dance, attributed to Cotsiogo (Cadzi Cody)
- Buffalo Robe
- Feathered war bonnet
- Headdress (Cheyenne or Lakota)
- Mató Nájin/Standing Bear, Battle of Little Bighorn
- Two sides of Lakota life on a beaded suitcase
- Custer's Last Stand — from the Lakota perspective
- Paukeigope (Kiowa), Cradleboard
- Carrie Bethel, Basket bowl
- Allan Houser, “Earth Song”
- Brummett Echohawk, An Island of Redbuds on the Cimarron
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Buffalo Robe
The people of the North American Plains were predominantly nomadic, living in large territories roamed by great herds of buffalo.
Early adopters of the horse, they lived in societies governed by profound military and religious traditions which produced richly decorated clothing and weaponry. The Plains peoples fought ferociously to maintain their independence as the European nations of North America spread westwards in the nineteenth century. Eventually, after decades of resistance, most Plains people were forced to live on reservations, where despite documented official efforts to eliminate them, traditional practices and languages have survived.
Blackfoot record of war exploits
Plains Indian men like the Blackfoot wore buffalo hides like this one as robes. They painted their warlike deeds onto them. Men gained honour from brave deeds in war, including striking or killing enemies, being wounded, capturing horses and taking scalps.
The owner of this robe is shown dressed in a yellow shirt with a war-bonnet on his head. He is capturing a woman, firing arrows from behind a wounded horse, and holding four scalps from defeated enemies. The owner is certainly shown eight times, each with an eagle feather war bonnet and yellow shirt. In the middle and on the left he is portrayed with a calumet (pipe), indicating leadership in a war party. Though the artist is not known, the claw-like necklace does suggest a bear or eagle connection with his name.
Depictions of war exploits painted on hides were very popular up until the 19th century. Here one can see the protagonist holding scalps, killing and touching enemies including a woman visible on the bottom left hand corner.
Four depictions of enlarged red scalps are shown with paths connecting the owner to the dead, scalped enemy. On the middle right is a shield, painted red with green stars, representing the personal medicine of the owner. On the left-hand side the warrior is depicted capturing a woman, dressed in green, and above them he is shown sheltering behind his horse, wounded in the leg, and firing arrows.
The decoration of war robes and other types of shirt use a number of elements to convey the event: personal medicine, symbolism, the use of synonyms (here the use of claws suggests that the owner might have had a name such as White Eagle, or Lone Bear), metonyms (where something is named or illustrated by one of its attributes, for example 'war bonnet' for "chief").
© Trustees of the British Museum
Want to join the conversation?
- My class did a project on the Plains indians and didn't the indians use every part of the buffalo ?(1 vote)
- Yes, the Plains tribes used every part. It was crucial to their survival. They used the skin for clothing, and homes. Bones for cultural beliefs, and/or weapons. The meat was used for eating, and/or hunting. In the Native culture we believe it is intended to use all of the animal, and give thanks after we catch an animal. We give thanks to the Creator, and the spirit of the animal who gave us the supplies for our survival. :) Hope this helped.(8 votes)
- Do the different colors have specific meanings?(3 votes)
- Was the main reason of fighting in Native American tribes before the arrival of the Europeans like 'This is MY friends' meadow. You can't have it'? Or was it different, because i read something about them believing that the land wasn't for owning, but for everyone.(2 votes)