Main content
Modernisms 1900-1980
Course: Modernisms 1900-1980 > Unit 9
Lesson 1: Abstract Expressionism- Abstract Expressionism, an introduction
- Finding meaning in abstraction
- Norman Lewis, Untitled
- de Kooning, Woman I
- How to paint like Willem de Kooning
- How to paint like Willem de Kooning - Part 2
- Willem de Kooning, Woman, I (from MoMA)
- Barnett Newman
- Newman's Onement I, 1948
- The Painting Techniques of Barnett Newman
- Restoring Rothko
- Why is that important? Looking at Jackson Pollock
- Representation and abstraction: Millais's Ophelia and Newman's Vir Heroicus Sublimis
- The Case For Mark Rothko
- Rothko, No. 210/No. 211 (Orange)
- Mark Rothko's No. 3/No. 13
- The Painting Techniques of Mark Rothko
- The Painting Techniques of Jackson Pollock
- The Case for Jackson Pollock
- Jackson Pollock, Autumn Rhythm (Number 30)
- Jackson Pollock, Mural
- Paint Application Studies of Jackson Pollock's Mural
- "One: Number 31, 1950" by Jackson Pollock, 1950 | MoMA Education
- Lee Krasner, Untitled
- Robert Motherwell, Elegy to the Spanish Republic No. 57
- Franz Kline
- The Painting Techniques of Franz Kline
- Hedda Sterne, Number 3—1957
- "Low Water” by Joan Mitchell
- Beauford Delaney's portrait of Marian Anderson
- Abstract Expressionism
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Hedda Sterne, Number 3—1957
Hedda Sterne's 1957 painting, Number 3, uses commercial spray paint to create a complex, abstract cityscape. Sterne's innovative use of materials and her exploration of light and structure reflect her diverse artistic influences, from Dada and Constructivism to Surrealism and Abstract Expressionism. Despite early recognition, Sterne's work is only now being reevaluated and displayed in major museums. Created by Smarthistory.
Video transcript
(gentle piano music) - [Steven] We're in the
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts looking at a large
vertically oriented canvas by Hedda Sterne. This is Number 3 and
it was painted in 1957, but it's spray paint. - [Sarah] Hedda was using
commercial spray paint on these paintings in 1957. She's also very experimental
with her materials. Rather than using a brush,
although there's some brushwork, she's using a can of spray
paint to sort of have the medium match the subject that she is
portraying, very abstractly. - [Steven] Using aerosol to apply paint is an industrial process and
it seems perfectly fitted to the city in which she found herself. My eye moves so easily across
the surface of this canvas. And I'm very much aware
of its two dimensionality, but at the same time,
she's able to achieve these deep recessive spaces
that open this canvas up and make it a much more complex space. - [Sarah] We can read this as
a completely abstract painting or we can think about her process which is that she would
often make drawings underneath highways or bridge structures, but that wasn't necessarily all
that the painting was about. It was her beginning point. - [Steven] We're looking
at this kaleidoscope of amorphous forms, almost like we're looking through girders that are soft panes of
a stained glass window. - [Sarah] It's almost
like a diaphanous light. There's always this back
and forth in her paintings between structure and light. And she's often talked about how if she could paint with light, she would paint with light. - [Steven] The surface
is really complicated. You have this atomized
paint that has areas where it's more diaphanous
and where it's denser. And you have this wonderful arc that moves from the upper right, down to the lower center of the canvas scraped along that to create this velocity that unifies the canvas
and draws our eye through. And so, there is this
sense of her body moving across the surface of this canvas. - [Sarah] That sense of
speed and motion and movement is really present. She's communicating this
bodily sense of the way one might experience
speed in a pulsating city. This her arm, her hand that is moving as an extension of the spray can to give you that industrial environment. - [Steven] There's a
long history of artists celebrating American industry. I think for instance of
the kaleidoscopic images that were produced by Joseph
Stella earlier in the century, but those were much more defined images. This is a much more abstract painting. - [Sarah] There is probably
a shared sense of wonder at the city between Joseph
Stella and Hedda Sterne. But Hedda came to this style by way of a few different
movements beforehand. She in fact grew up in the midst of the Dada and Constructivism
Movement in Bucharest. She had participated in the
Surrealist Movement in the 1930s before she came to New York. And then, she was very much a
part of the group of artists of the Abstract Expressionists era. - [Steven] And that language
of abstract expressionism of Pollock dripping or the notion that Harold Rosenberg
developed of action painting became synonymous with
the work of these artists and may explain to some
extent the neglect of her work over the last 50 years. - [Sarah] And also when she felt that she had explored a style or a process to the full extent she could, then she was on another question. - [Steven] And Hedda Sterne was recognized for her art early in her career. The heiress and gallerist Peggy Guggenheim showed her work quite early. - [Sarah] Hedda had a collage
included in exhibition in the late 1930s. And in fact that was the
connection that Hedda had when she came to the US. Hedda was Jewish. She had to escape
Bucharest, Romania in 1941. And one of the first people she looked up when she arrived in New
York was Peggy Guggenheim. And there she was very much a part of both the Emigres circle of artists
that had come from Europe, as well as the younger generation of New York American artists. And then she became a
regular central artist at Betty Parson's Gallery. She was showing at the same time as Jackson Pollock, Barnett Newman. Just very much a part of
that circle of artists. - [Steven] And thanks to your work, Hedda Sterne is being reevaluated. Her work is emerging from
the store rooms of museums around the country and being
put back onto the walls. - [Sarah] I am so delighted
to see her work on view at the Whitney Museum, at
the Museum of Modern Art. The Metropolitan has her
work in their collection. The Art Institute of Chicago has her work in their collection. All of these institutions
purchased her work in the 1950s, but I think for a long time
curators didn't have a sense of context for where to put her work or how to put it in dialogue. Some of that was overall
neglect of women artists. And I think that we're in
a very different moment where curators and art historians
are thinking differently. So it absolutely makes sense
to put her work in galleries with the artists that
she was working alongside in the 1940s and the 1950s. - [Steven] I wanna learn a history of art that is large enough to
include Hedda Sterne. (lively piano music)