Main content
Start here
Course: Start here > Unit 2
Lesson 5: Questions in art history- What is Cultural Heritage?
- Where are the women artists?
- Must art be beautiful?
- Is there a difference between art and craft?
- What's the point of realism?
- What makes art valuable—then and now?
- Copying — spotlight: Virgin Hodegetria
- Copying as innovation and resistance
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Where are the women artists?
This video brought to you by Tate.org.uk
By calling attention to identity, sexuality, politics, and history, women artists have dominated the art debates for the last several decades. Despite this, only a small percentage of gallery collections and displays belong to women artists, even today. So how do we go about talking about women in art history? Learn more about the changing role of female artists in a male dominated art world over the centuries. Join Jemima Kirke as she guides us through a history of women in art, exploring the ways in which they have been represented, underrepresented, and sometimes misrepresented.
By calling attention to identity, sexuality, politics, and history, women artists have dominated the art debates for the last several decades. Despite this, only a small percentage of gallery collections and displays belong to women artists, even today. So how do we go about talking about women in art history? Learn more about the changing role of female artists in a male dominated art world over the centuries. Join Jemima Kirke as she guides us through a history of women in art, exploring the ways in which they have been represented, underrepresented, and sometimes misrepresented.
Should there exist a separate Women’s Art History to tell this story, or is it simply a matter of inserting women into existing narratives? What about removing the label altogether, and referring to women artists as just artists? Would this ignore an important component of identity or recognise that women and men can be artists in equal measure? How can women artists be sufficiently recognised without distancing them from art history as we know it?
. Created by Tate.Want to join the conversation?
- How can we -as art-consumers and art-history students- contribute to improving the position of female artists in museums and art history lessons?(16 votes)
- Personally, I believe we need to support females with whatever they want to do in their life. We are too busy believing certain careers are gender based when in reality they are not. We need to acknowledge women and show/teach others on the achievements that these women have.(4 votes)
- What would be a realistic representation of female artists in art museums? How large a part of high-profile artists these days are women? I find it fascinating to hear that women have been leading the scene for decades, but how do we know this if they are still so underrepresented in traditional art contexts?(5 votes)
- According to the National Museum of Women in the Arts, 51% of visual artists today are women. But when it comes to exhibitions and gallery representation, the numbers tell a different story. London, for example. has 134 galleries which represent 3163 artists, and within them:
– 31% of the represented artists are women,
– 78% of the galleries represent more men than women,
– 17% of the galleries represent more women than men,
– and only 5% represent an equal number of male and female artists,
More statistics here: http://elf-audit.com/the-results/(20 votes)
- Hard question but: is it fair to demonstrate for higher percent of women in galleries, even if there is more good male artist? If there's no 30% good women artist?
Opinions?(2 votes)- Men are no more talented nor inherently more skillful than women. The prejudices that have inhibited women for so long and that still discounts them has robbed us of their creative brilliance. Imagine what we have lost, a cultural history filled with twice as many Leonardos, Dürers, Raphaels, and Picassos. We are all poorer for our self-defeating prejudices.(17 votes)
- Can I have a list of the film clips shown in this video? Or how can I find out? It's frustrating that these arent' informative enough.(4 votes)
- You'll find a list of images and clips at themark, listed in the order that they appeared in the film. If you're trying to identify any one work in particular, just let me know and I'll be happy to help! 5:15(7 votes)
- i've seen abstract expressionism, here(khan academy partners), and i was thinking ''ok but where are the women??" i had to come here, and see about WOMEN in art. how come this has not changed yet?(5 votes)
- From a scientific point of view, if something hasn't changed yet it means that there wasn't enough need for it to change. I found out that Newton's laws of motion work for describing social changes. "an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by an external force". A social rule remains unchanged unless enough people put in enough effort for it to change.(4 votes)
- Where are the women artists in the rest of the Khan art history content? I really enjoyed this video but would like to see it followed up in the rest of the Khan content.(5 votes)
- There is some great information in the following links:
https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/tate/women-in-art/women-as-artists/
https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/tate/women-in-art/womens-issues-in-art/
Tate has also had an amazing series of exhibitions dedicated to female artists in recent years: Barbara Hepworth, Mira Schendel, Agnes Martin, Ellen Gallagher, Sonia Delaunay, Marlene Dumas and Saloua Raouda Choucair. I'm including some links below but the rest are searchable on the Tate site and link to other interesting content and research.
http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/saloua-raouda-choucair
http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/exhibition/barbara-hepworth-sculpture-modern-world
http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/ey-exhibition-sonia-delaunay
http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/marlene-dumas-image-burden(4 votes)
- Interesting that so many women take on craft as a 'feminine' activity where it is also a 'feminist' one. I wonder how it can be relayed to people that crafts such as weaving and embroidery are as artistically valid as painting and photography?(6 votes)
- I think it would take a major shift in social perspective and public education, similar to the shift that is still needed to convince people that male and female subject shouldn't be treated any differently in art. It will probably take a lot of time, effort, and mistakes.
Personally, I think children need to be exposed to all mediums of art in a respectful manner at a young age. I have yet to meet someone who has tried their hand at sewing and still disregards fine needlework.(2 votes)
- At, whose work is this?? Really impressive!! 4:50(3 votes)
- It's by Paula Rego. The work is titled "Dog Woman" 1994. https://www.wikiart.org/en/paula-rego/dog-woman-1994(1 vote)
- Natalia LL's "Consumer Art" and Katarzyna Kozyra's "The arrival of Lou Salome" have recently been removed from the National Museum in Warsaw for reportedly distracting schoolchildren with their scandalous nature. The man responsible claims "certain themes of gender shouldn't be explicitly shown". Not exactly a question, but I couldn't help but think about it when hearing about the scandalous bunny man.(3 votes)
- Very interesting that this debate about women in art still seems to only center white women. Did these female activists also advocate the rights of women of color?(2 votes)
Video transcript
These monkeys are the Guerrilla Girls. Anonymous artists who work to expose sexual and racial discrimination in the art world. In 1985 they fly-posted Manhattan in protest at the lack of women in exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art. It featured 169 artists, less than 10 per cent of the exhibitors were women. It was a time when female artists were playing a central role in experimental art. Not that you would've known this walking into a mainstream gallery or museum. There have always been women who are artists, but it was men who wrote the history books and somehow they just forgot to mention them. During the Renaissance women were encouraged to paint as it was seen as desirable for women to be accomplished in the arts. In fact, by the 18th century women were allowed to paint all that they wanted just so long as they embodied feminine traits like beauty, grace and modesty and their paintings were beautiful, gracious and modest too. As one critic said 'so long as a woman remains from unsexing herself, let her dabble in anything.' But women had this burning desire to be taken seriously, which is ridiculous because everyone knows that women have weak hands so can't paint or sculpt properly. The 17th century artist Judith Leyster worked at the same time as the Dutch master Frans Hals. Her works had a similar style, Leyster was well-respected during her lifetime but because she was a woman she disappeared into obscurity after her death and only re-emerged when it was discovered that seven of her paintings had been wrongly attributed to Frans Hals including this one, in the Louvre. Some female artists adopted male names, like Claude Cahun and Grace Hartigan, who signed her works 'George.' Some artists just used their initials. LK,
is Lee Krasner. Here she is labouring under the weight of constantly being referred to as Mrs Jackson Pollock. Some female artists chose to work as models to support their career and to learn from their male contemporaries. In order to find their own direction some
women artists worked with textiles and craft. Men had largely ignored these mediums because they considered them to be secondary to painting and sculpture. It gave women the freedom to experiment. For similar reasons they embraced new materials and new media like photography and video and became innovators in performance and installation. Yet they were still underrepresented. By 1970, tired of being patronised, ignored and disregarded some women decided to take on the establishment. In 1971 Margaret Harrison's drawings became the first feminist art exhibition in London but the cops shut it down. Because of a drawing of Hugh Hefner dressed as a bunny girl with a bunny penis. I think he's in here. I never really got to the bottom of it, but
it was thought of being too pornographic. Now, they didn't mind the women in the sandwiches what they did mind was why I altered the male body. When the Gallery Director said well, what don't you like about it? to this policeman he said well, it was the way she treated the men, we thought that was disgusting! In the US art historians Linda Nochlin and Ann Sutherland Harris staged a show called Women Artists: 1550 to 1950, which inspired revisionist debates about the history of art because this is a problem for art historians. Do they simply go back in time and just insert these female artists into the pages of art history? That seems to ignore the fact that these artists have been historically ignored. Do they write books just about women artists? But that only marginalises, pigeon-holes and isolates these artists from the movements, influences and errors that they have been a part of. This is still a hotly debated issue and has led to a radical re-thinking of the way the history of art is presented. By calling attention to identity, sexuality, politics and history women artists have dominated the debates surrounding art for the past four decades and pushed the boundaries of art to represent the complicated realities of today's world in all its many forms.