If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser.

Main content

Should Art Be Publicly Funded?

Google Classroom

Public funding for art sparks debate. Supporters argue it enriches society, fosters creativity, and provides opportunities for artists. Critics claim it's not a government's role and funds could be better used elsewhere. The discussion helps us understand art's societal value.

Want to join the conversation?

Sort by:

Yabusame
Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to Yabusame's post “At 1:29, who is the only ...”
At
1:29
, who is the only woman who appears in the right side of the photograph depicting Lyndon B. Johnson's speech?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(5 votes)
Answer
rdeyke
Posted 2 years ago. Direct link to rdeyke's post “Wouldn't crowdfunding be ...”
Wouldn't crowdfunding be a viable alternative to government funding and funding by rich patrons?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
- David Alexander
  Posted 2 years ago. Direct link to David Alexander's post “Yes, it is an alternative...”
  Yes, it is an alternative funding source. Croudfunding offers the possibility of "not-rich" patrons.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (1 vote)

Video transcript