AP®︎ World History
WATCH: Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires
Overview of the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires and their Turko-Mongol origins. Discussions of devshirme, janissaries and ghulams. Gunpowder empires.
Want to join the conversation?
- What happened to the Golden Horde?? They have an awesome name, but we didn't hear about them... :/(20 votes)
- The 'Golden Horde', with their cool name, couldn't keep up that coolness.They were the Mughals who ruled Russia.The Russians later expelled them under Ivan III or also known as Ivan the Great.
Good question, though!(22 votes)
- How come there is no more in-depth material on Ottomans aside from this one video?(11 votes)
- how the ottoman empire expanded and started ruling the whole world?(3 votes)
- As explained in the video, the Ottoman empire was one of the so-called "gunpowder empires", using cannons and guns effectively to conquer and expand. Of course, that is only part of the truth. There are several other reasons why the Ottomans succeeded:
1) The spiritual conquest of Anatolia: Spiritual leaders came from Belkh/Kharezm (a region in Ilkhanate, Afghanistan today) to Anatolia, taking Sufism with them to the largely Rum/christian land. They are often cited as the actual conquerors, referred to as the conquerors of the heart or the spirit of the Anatolian people.
2) The Seljuk or Seldjuk empire: Anatolia was already under the reign of the turko-persian Seljuks, which prepared the land for a switch to the turko-persian culture and reign.
3) Disintegration of the Byzantinian empire: The christian East Roman or Byzantinian empire was corrupt and falling apart. The Byzantinian emperor was so cornered by his christian fellows that he chose to trust and tolerate the turko-persians more.
History is never a straight line. It is a continuous re-alignment of interests and forces.(20 votes)
- Wait, why was the Safavid leader considered Turkish, also were Turks in Azerbaijan ruling class?(5 votes)
- Is the name Ottoman related to the Hindu term "Atman"?(2 votes)
- The Ottoman Empire is named after its first ruler Osman.(6 votes)
- When did the Ottoman Empire end?(3 votes)
- It collapsed not long after the end of the First World War.(3 votes)
- At5:40, Sal says that the Ottoman Empire had a Grand Vizier. I remember from somewhere that Egypt also had a Grand Vizier. If this is true, why are they similar in this way?(2 votes)
- The Grand Vizier is a muslim title. I believe the rank of vizier first was established by the Abbasids, then spread to the rest of the Islamic World.
The vizier of Egypt is by no means Islamic or anything. It's not how the Egyptians called the position themselves but is the name that historians use for the position in that empire that did basically the same things that a vizier in the Islamic empires would do.(4 votes)
- Did the Safavid Empire take the Ghulams because of their race, or did they take them because of their religion? Is this system learned from the Ottoman Empire, or was it developed on its own?(2 votes)
- Good question! Race wasn't an important category at this time, but ethnicity and religion were. Most Ghulam were from Christian societies, many in the Caucasus region. It was common during this era for prisoners of war to become enslaved, and many soldiers were forcibly conscripted in this way. If you're interested in reading more, I recommend the book Slaves of the Shah: New Elites of Safavid Iran.(3 votes)
- Do people still follow the religion Akbar Created?(1 vote)
- To my knowledge, it never really gained much traction out of Akbar and some of the people around him. The Divine Faith was based off of the notion that no one religion held the key to life and everything. Other religions, having the doctrine that they had the best way to go about things and the best conception of the world, ,didn't like this, so they criticized the religion. It never grew beyond a really limited handful of followers.(4 votes)
- Why did the Ottomans not revert to a Non-Turkish culture? It seems as if the other main originally Turkish dynasties, by the end, reverted to local traditions. This I find surprising because the Ottomans essentially plunged into the Islamic world and were far away from the Mongol/Turkish homeland. Did the collapse of the Byzantine Empire (and perhaps byzantine culture as well) have something to do with it?(2 votes)
- [Sal] We are now going to go further in our study of the evolution of the empires in Asia. And in this video, we're going to focus on what happens in North India, Persia, the Middle East, and the Anatolian peninsula, what we would consider modern-day Turkey. So right here is roughly what Asia looked like around the year 1300. As you might remember from previous videos, as we entered into the 13th century, you have Genghis Khan or Genghis Khan take over much of Asia from Mongolia. But by the time you get to 1300, the empire has fragmented into these various khanates. The Yuan Dynasty in China, Chagatai Khanate in Central Asia, the Golden Horde in Northwest Asia, and the Ilkhanate in Persia and the Middle East. Now, two things to keep note of as we look at this map that are relevant to this video is notice this tiny little kingdom right over here. This is one of the many fragmented kingdoms that result after the Sultanate of Rum collapses in the middle of the 13th century. This kingdom in particular is founded by someone by the name of Osman, or the Arabic version of the name would be Uthman or Othman. And so this is the nascent Ottoman empire forming right over here. And over here you have the Delhi Sultanate, which was the first significant Muslim empire over in North India. And notably, they were one of the few empires that were able to fend off the Mongols. But now let's fast forward roughly 100 years. Now a few things have changed. The Ming Dynasty has taken over the Yuan Dynasty in the middle of the 14th century. The Mongols in the east are now relegated to the Northern Yuan Dynasty, but there still is the Chagatai Khanate and the Golden Horde. But much of their territory, including the Ilkhanate, has now been taken over by Timur, who we talk about in previous videos. And Timur famously sacked Delhi and really brought the Delhi Sultanate to its knees and as we will see, it will only last for roughly another 100 years. Now, you might also notice that the Ottoman empire, founded by Osman or Othman is continuing to grow and continuing to conquer. Now one thing to keep in mind. In previous videos, we talk about the invention of gunpowder in Tang China and the early Song dynasty, which was about four to five hundred years before the period that we're talking about right now. But as we get into this period, we are now starting to see the use of gunpowder for guns and in particular artillery. And when I say artillery, think cannons. So let's fast forward another 200 years to see how the empires of Asia have evolved. So now we see several things. The Ming Dynasty is still in control of much of China. The Northern Yuan are still in Mongolia. You have a Kazakh Khanate, descendant from the Mongols. By the late 16th and early 17th century the Ottoman Empire has now expanded significantly, encompassing much of the Middle East. In Persia, you see that the Timurid Empire fell within a few decades after the death of Timur. And as we enter into the 16th century, you have the Safavid Dynasty take over. And then also in the 16th century, almost coincident with the founding of the Safavid Dynasty in Persia, you have Timur's grandson's great-grandson, Babur, who's born in current-day Uzbekistan, is able to defeat the Delhi Sultanate and establish the Mughal Empire. And Mughal is just the Persian word for Mongol and Babur is a direct descendant of Timur on his father's side and of Genghis Khan on his mother's side. Now, many historians often group these three empires or dynasties together because they do share some commonalities. And so let's think about each of them individually and think about where they are similar and where they are different. Not a lot is known about Osman who founds that first kingdom in the Anatolian peninsula. It's a Sunni Islamic empire. In fact, the leader is eventually named a caliph. The ruling class of this empire is Turkish. Now, one of their distinguishing characteristics is what's known as the Devshirme system in which the Sultan, the Emperor, would have a personal army of what could be called slaves, these Janissaries. These Janissaries were actually Christian boys taken at a young age and then indoctrinated into the Janissary system. The reason why I said you can kind of call them slaves is that although they were forced to become Janissaries and taken from their families, they were given many privileges and over time, many of these Janissaries became some of the most notable figures in the Ottoman Empire, some of them even becoming the Grand Vizier, effectively ruling over the empire. Now, the Ottomans are also known for one of the earliest empires to very successfully to use gunpowder in battle. The Safavids, as you can see here, were really founded in the very early 16th century, officially 1501, by their founder Shah Ismail, sometimes known as Ismail I. And he is the heir to a religious dynasty, the Safavias. It is a Muslim dynasty, like the Ottoman Empire, but unlike the Ottoman Empire, it is based on Twelver Shia Islam. Twelver Shia is the major group of Shias today and it is based on the belief of 12 imams following Mohammed starting with Ali and we have videos on the Sunni-Shia split. Now, even though Ismail spoke Turkish and was raised in a Turkic society, this dynasty brought back much of the culture of Ancient Persia. In fact, it's viewed as the first dynasty since the Sassanids that actually had native Persian rule and brought back that Persian culture, part of which is using the word Shah. You remember Cyrus the Great, the Shahanshah, the King of Kings. Now they had what is known as Ghulams, which is very similar to the idea of a Janissary. These are slave soldiers which are taken as captives but then are raised to be an elite military unit and eventually often have significant wealth and significant power. Now you might be wondering, why did any of these empires and these aren't the only ones, you have the Mamluks and other Muslim empires. Why would people create these elite soldiers out of slaves and give them that much power? Well, the answer is, they were the safest people to give power to. Remember, these empires are ruling over many tribes and many groups and many kingdoms that are constantly vying for power, trying to establish their own dynasties. And if you allowed people from those various tribes to protect you as Emperor, well, there might be a good shot that one of them might want to kill you and establish their own dynasty. But from a young age, if you could indoctrinate these young boys as Ghulams, or as Janissaries, well, they might be more loyal to you. And indeed, it did provide an unusual amount of stability. As I mentioned, the Mughal Empire was able to be founded by Babur, who was Timur's great-grandson's grandson and he, too, was born in a Turco-Mongolian tradition. As he's able to famously defeat the Delhi Sultanate which had already been significantly weakened, one, on its own, but then by Timur over 100 years before, he famously comes to power with the aid of gunpowder, being able to defeat a significantly larger Delhi Sultanate army. The Mughals practiced Sunni Islam but they ruled over a large Hindu majority, and so the first several Mughal rulers were actually quite tolerant. Perhaps the most tolerant was Akbar, often known as Akbar the Great, who we'll do other videos on, who actually tried to create a religion which was a merger between Islam and Hinduism and Jainism and Christianity. But then they become less tolerant under Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb. Shah Jahan famous for building the Taj Mahal for his wife, but what's often not noted is he was building this fairly grand mausoleum at a time when there was a famine in India and he was also known as being fairly intolerant and persecuted many Hindus and Sikhs and his son, Aurangzeb, continued to do so. Now, some historians will refer to these three empires as the Gunpowder Empires. If someone says Gunpowder Empires, they're referring to these three. The reason why they're called that is this view that these major centralized empires were able to form only with the power of gunpowder. The Ottomans, famous for early use of artillery. The Mughals, Babur in particular, came to power with gunpowder. But today, historians are somewhat skeptical of grouping just these three empires as Gunpowder Empires. You had many other large centralized empires form before the use of gunpowder. So that whole thesis is not as popular today.