If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

America as a world power

AP.USH: KC‑8.1.I.D.i (KC), KC‑8.1.I.E (KC), KC‑8.1.II.C.i (KC), Unit 8: Learning Objective H, WOR (Theme)

Problem

“The unsettled nature of Latin American politics was well matched to the context of international relations as a whole. The late 1950s and early 1960s witnessed fundamental changes in the Cold War. . . Added to the concurrent collapse of European colonialism, these trends increasingly pushed U.S.-Soviet conflict into the underdeveloped world. . . They vied for access to the strategic real estate and resources of the underdeveloped countries . . . For the United States, this meant showing that democracy and liberal capitalism could serve as a path to wealth and political stability. For Moscow, it meant proving that state-directed socialism could bring about economic equity and social justice. The fight for the [underdeveloped world] revolved around ideology no less than economics or strategy.”
-Source: Hal Brands, historian, Latin America’s Cold War, 2012
The United States’ strategies expressed in the excerpt have the most in common with which of the following?
Choose 1 answer:
Choose 1 answer: