Main content
AP®︎/College Art History
Course: AP®︎/College Art History > Unit 6
Lesson 1: Enlightenment and revolution- Cabrera, Portrait of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz
- Wright of Derby, A Philosopher Lecturing on the Orrery
- Fragonard, The Swing
- Thomas Jefferson, Monticello
- David, Oath of the Horatii
- David, Oath of the Horatii
- Jean-Antoine Houdon, George Washington
- Vigée Le Brun, Self-Portrait
- Goya, And there's nothing to be done (from the Disasters of War)
- Painting colonial culture: Ingres’s La Grande Odalisque
- Ingres, La Grande Odalisque
- Delacroix, Liberty Leading the People
- Delacroix, Liberty Leading the People
- Thomas Cole, The Oxbow
- Thomas Cole, The Oxbow
- Early Photography: Niépce, Talbot and Muybridge
- Turner, Slave Ship
- Charles Barry and A.W.N. Pugin, Palace of Westminster (Houses of Parliament)
© 2023 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Fragonard, The Swing
Fragonard's "The Swing" is a Rococo painting commissioned by a French royal court member, showcasing playful eroticism and sensuality. The artwork features rapid brushwork, symbolizing secretive eroticism, and abundant nature. It represents the frivolity, luxury, and indulgence of the Rococo style, contrasting with the later neoclassicism movement. Jean-Honoré Fragonard, The Swing, oil on canvas, 1767 (Wallace Collection, London) Speakers: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker. Created by Beth Harris and Steven Zucker.
Want to join the conversation?
- Umm..... A couple questions here. 1) Why do you think the woman is lit up even though most of the landscape is all dark and stuff? Oh, the man in the bushes looks like he is waiting for the other, very innocent man to leave while also stealing her attention. Not at all suspicious, lady. And 2) What exactly is Rococo? I know it's a style of art but exactly what style? If I can get an answer to either of those questions, that'd be okay. kthxbye!(2 votes)
- I agree with Annelise. Regarding the first question, the contrast of the woman's brightness against an otherwise shadowy background is the first thing that interested me in the painting. While I do think that she is depicted in lighter colors so that Fragonard can show her as an important subject in the painting, I also think that it is valuable to note the hues of her face and dress. The blush tones suggest sensual feelings and cravings, as pink and creamy colors are often associated with love. Regarding the entire painting, this adds depth to the idea that the woman is desirable and lusted after by the man on the left. Because the woman is so overtly the focal point, Fragonard can more largely display the large presence that sensual feelings play in our lives.(4 votes)
- how many days do you think it took to make a painting like this?(2 votes)
- This is true.. It took some artists years to complete a single piece. For others: the matter of hours or days. You can tell how much time that was taken on a piece by the amount of detail and layers of color.(2 votes)
- The legs do not appear to be correctly angled from the women's torso. Does anyone else see this?(2 votes)
- No. One must remember that the women is kicking her legs in the air, so her legs are not at rest position.(2 votes)
- can anyone tell me how this painting is connected to the aristocracy(2 votes)
- For one thing, this is a painting of aristocracy. If you can't tell from their expensive outfits.(1 vote)
- At, the female art historian states that the putti are sitting on a behive. Does anyone else think it is the head of a carp with its mouth open? It looks like an asian sculpture of an animal, not a beehive. Also, if that is indeed what it is - what do you think it symbolizes in the piece. Thoughts? 2:11(1 vote)
- I saw this as a dolphin right away. Not that it looks like one, but artists frequently portrayed dolphins as these odd looking fish like creatures in art. For me the dolphin reference makes a nice connection with the sea and with Venus. Venus was born on the sea and is associated with love, beauty and sexual forces.(3 votes)
- I was wondering if frames from older painting are given with the original painting or if they were made later? Who made the frame for this painting?(2 votes)
- Would you say this piece has an overall sense of balance?(1 vote)
- I think so, especially since she is centered towards the middle of the piece and the two men are on either side of her, creating a kind of triangular composition.(3 votes)
- Is this an abstract painting?(0 votes)
- I wouldn't call it that. Abstract tends to take regular images and make them irregular by changing colour, size, perception etc, whereas in this work it is seen as more traditional with it's realistic content.(5 votes)
- What genre is this painting? I thought group portrait or is it not posed enough to be a portrait?(1 vote)
- This is not a portrait, this is a dreamland. The style is Rococo and it is not a genre scene.(2 votes)
- What style of painting is this?(3 votes)
- While Fragonard was a Rococo painter (The Rococo style was favored by the elite), he also would find ways to criticize the frivolity of the upper and middle classes in France.(0 votes)
Video transcript
(jazzy piano music) - [Steven] We're in the
Wallace Collection in London, looking at Fragonard's "The Swing." - [Beth] This was commissioned by a member of the French royal
court, who asked Fragonard to paint his lover on a swing, being pushed by a bishop, while he hid and looked
up his mistress's dress. - [Steven] By the time Fragonard
takes on the commission and renders it, the bishop is no longer really a bishop, just an older man, but he's barely visible
in the lower right. So this is a painting
that was from the outset meant to be playful,
erotic, sexually-charged, that was a bit too naughty
to be publicly displayed. - [Beth] Well, like many Rococo paintings, it was a private commission, it was for a private home, and it was for a member
of the aristocracy. - [Steven] This is a transitional moment in Fragonard's career. He had been known for large-scale, very formal history paintings,
and it's just at this moment when he's abandoning that kind of career for private patrons outside of the system of royal commissions. - [Beth] In that system
of royal commissions for the academy, history
paintings were primary, scenes from mythology,
from French history, from ancient Greek and Roman history, so this couldn't be more different. - [Steven] It wasn't just
the subject that changed in Fragonard's art, it
was also his technique. His private commissions
tended to be created quickly, with rapid brushwork,
and we see that here. Look, for instance, at the edging of the woman's dress. Part of the energy that
that dress achieves is a result of the rapid brushwork. - [Beth] You can really see the oil paint, for example, in her bodice,
or in the white lace. - [Steven] And the idea
of secretive eroticism is built into this painting symbolically, if you look at the left edge, you see a painting of a sculpture. This is by a Rococo
sculptor named Falconet, and is known as "Menacing Love." And you can see that the
Cupid has his finger up, as if asking us to keep a secret. - [Beth] Below that, we see
a lovely relief sculpture that looks like maenads or nymphs dancing, and that's not the only
sculpture we see here. - [Steven] To the lower right,
we see two Cupid figures that seem to be riding
a classicizing dolphin, part of a fountain, and in
fact, you can see the water spraying out towards the
lower right of the painting. - [Beth] But the star of the
painting is the young woman, and really, her fabulous pink silk dress, lined with lace, her bodice,
her decolletage, her breasts, her choker, her hat, and to me especially, that pink slipper that
she flips up into the air. - [Steven] A way of
understanding the Rococo is a style of art that
comes out of the Baroque, but has jettisoned the
seriousness, the morality, but has maintained its sense of energy, its sense of movement. Look at that swing, look
at that forward momentum that actually carries
the slipper off her foot. - [Beth] And we know that the
Baroque used diagonal lines to create a sense of movement and energy, and we see that here,
when we follow the rope of the swing through the female figure, and down to her lover in the lower left, who leans back on his right elbow, and lifts up his left
arm and seems overtaken by his love and desire for his companion. She's sitting on red velvet that's got a gilded molding
at the bottom of it. We're not in the woods here. We're in a cultivated,
aristocratic garden, although an incredibly lush one. Nature is so abundant and fertile here, it's clearly relating to
the sensuality of the story, and couldn't be more
different than the spareness, the severity, the plainness that we'll see in paintings by David just a few years before the Revolution, when
we really have an opposition to this type of subject matter, and when critics begin to call for an art that is very different,
that offers a moral, instead of indulging in
this kind of sensuality. - [Steven] And because this
painting becomes a foil to paintings by David with a
style known as neoclassicism, the Rococo becomes a bit of a villain, and is looked back to
historically recently, by a Nigerian artist
named Yinka Shonibare, who has created a
three-dimensional representation of this painting, but that
deals with not sensuality, but the costs of colonialism, but that is all hindsight. Fragonard's "The Swing" is
such a perfect expression of the frivolity, the
luxury, and the indulgence of the Rococo. (jazzy piano music)