AP®︎/College Art History
- Key points for studying global prehistory
- Our earliest technology?
- Paleolithic art, an introduction
- Origins of rock art in Africa
- Apollo 11 Stones
- Camelid sacrum in the shape of a canine
- Rock art in North Africa
- Running horned woman, Tassili n’Ajjer
- The Neolithic Revolution
- Bushel with ibex motifs
- Anthropomorphic stele
- Jade Cong
- Working jade
- Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (UNESCO/NHK)
- Ambum Stone
- Tlatilco figurines
- Tlatilco Figurines
- Terracotta fragments, Lapita people
by Natalie Hager
All evidence points to Africa as the origin of our species … is Africa also the birthplace of art?
A significant discovery
Approximately 25,000 years ago, in a rock shelter in the Huns Mountains of Namibia on the southwest coast of Africa (today part of the Ai-Ais Richtersveld Transfrontier Park), an animal was drawn in charcoal on a hand-sized slab of stone. The stone was left behind, over time becoming buried on the floor of the cave by layers of sediment and debris until 1969 when a team led by German archaeologist W. E. Wendt excavated the rock shelter and found the first fragment (above, left). Wendt named the cave "Apollo 11" upon hearing on his shortwave radio of NASA’s successful space mission to the moon. It was more than three years later however, after a subsequent excavation, when Wendt discovered the matching fragment (above, right), that archaeologists and art historians began to understand the significance of the find.
Indirect dating techniques
In total seven stone fragments of brown-grey quartzite, some of them depicting traces of animal figures drawn in charcoal, ocher, and white, were found buried in a concentrated area of the cave floor less than two meters square. While it is not possible to learn the actual date of the fragments, it is possible to estimate when the rocks were buried by radiocarbon dating the archaeological layer in which they were found. Archaeologists estimate that the cave stones were buried between 25,500 and 25,300 years ago during the period in southern Africa making them, at the time of their discovery, the oldest dated art known on the African continent and among the earliest evidence of human artistic expression worldwide.
While more recent discoveries of much older human artistic endeavors have corrected our understanding (consider the 2008 discovery of a 100,000-year-old paint workshop in the Blombos Cave on the southern coast of Africa), the stones remain the oldest examples of figurative art from the African continent. Their discovery contributes to our conception of early humanity’s creative attempts, before the invention of formal writing, to express their thoughts about the world around them.
The origins of art?
Genetic and fossil evidence tells us that Homo sapiens (anatomically modern humans who evolved from an earlier species of hominids) developed on the continent of Africa more than 100,000 years ago and spread throughout the world. But what we do not know—what we have only been able to assume—is that art too began in Africa. Is Africa, where humanity originated, home to the world’s oldest art? If so, can we say that art began in Africa?
100,000 years of human occupation
The Apollo 11 rock shelter overlooks a dry gorge, sitting twenty meters above what was once a river that ran along the valley floor. The cave entrance is wide, about twenty-eight meters across, and the cave itself is deep: eleven meters from front to back. While today a person can stand upright only in the front section of the cave, during the Middle Stone Age, as well as in the periods before and after, the rock shelter was an active site of ongoing human settlement.
Inside the cave, above and below the layer where the Apollo 11 cave stones were found, archaeologists unearthed a sequence of cultural layers representing over 100,000 years of human occupation. In these layers stone artifacts, typical of the Middle Stone Age period—such as blades, pointed flakes, and scraper—were found in raw materials not native to the region, signaling stone tool technology transported over long distances. Among the remnants of hearths, ostrich eggshell fragments bearing traces of red color were also found—either remnants of ornamental painting or evidence that the eggshells were used as containers for pigment.
On the cave walls, belonging to the Later Stone Age period, rock paintings were discovered depicting white and red zigzags, two handprints, three geometric images, and traces of color. And on the banks of the riverbed just upstream from the cave, engravings of a variety of animals, some with zigzag lines leading upwards, were found and dated to less than 2000 years ago.
The Apollo 11 Cave Stones
But the most well-known of the rock shelter’s finds, and the most enigmatic, remain the Apollo 11 cave stones (image above). On the cleavage face of what was once a complete slab, an unidentified animal form was drawn resembling a feline in appearance but with human hind legs that were probably added later. Barely visible on the head of the animal are two slightly-curved horns likely belonging to an Oryx, a large grazing antelope; on the animal’s underbelly, possibly the sexual organ of a . Perhaps we have some kind of supernatural creature—a therianthrope, part human and part animal? If so, this may suggest a complex system of shamanistic belief. Taken together with the later rock paintings and the engravings, Apollo 11 becomes more than just a cave offering shelter from the elements. It becomes a site of ritual significance used by many over thousands of years.
The global origins of art
In the Middle Stone Age period in southern Africa prehistoric man was a hunter-gatherer, moving from place to place in search of food and shelter. But this modern human also drew an animal form with charcoal—a form as much imagined as it was observed. This is what makes the Apollo 11 cave stones find so interesting: the stones offer evidence that Homo sapiens in the Middle Stone Age—us, some 25,000 years ago—were not only anatomically modern, but behaviorally modern as well. That is to say, these early humans possessed the new and unique capacity for modern symbolic thought, “the human capacity,” long before what was previously understood.
The cave stones are what archaeologists term art mobilier—small-scale prehistoric art that is moveable. But mobile art, and rock art generally, is not unique to Africa. Rock art is a global phenomenon that can be found across the World—in Europe, Asia, Australia, and North and South America. While we cannot know for certain what these early humans intended by the things that they made, by focusing on art as the product of humanity’s creativity and imagination we can begin to explore where, and hypothesize why, art began.
Ralf Vogelsang, “The Rock-Shelter “Apollo 11” - Evidence of Early Modern Humans in South-Western Namibia,” in Heritage and Cultures in Modern Namibia - In-depth Views of the Country, edited by Cornelia Limpricht and Megan Biesele (Göttingen, Windhoek-Namibia: Klaus Hess Publishers, 2008), pp. 183–196.
W. E. Wendt, “‘Art Mobilier' from the Apollo 11 Cave, South West Africa: Africa’s Oldest Dated Works of Art,” The South African Archaeological Bulletin vol. 31, no. 121/122 (1976), pp. 5–11.
Essay by Nathalie Hager
Want to join the conversation?
- The author says: "...cave stones were buried between 25,500 and 25,300 years ago during the Middle Stone Age" and after this again: "Middle Stone Age—us, some 25,000 years ago". But I was sure that 25,000 years ago or 23,000 BCE is a period strongly considered as Upper or Late Stone Age (40-10 thousand years BCE). Is there a mistake in article?(9 votes)
- I sometimes draw imaginary figures to impose strong emotion and as a window to my personal feelings. As time passes and my drawings are historical artifacts, will it be said these figures truly existed? I would not like that.
I believe the appolo 11 rock drawing could be of the same nature(4 votes)
- I'm a bit confused when did they discover this(1 vote)
- In 1969 a team led by German archaeologist W.E. Wendt excavated the rock shelter and found the first fragment.(5 votes)
- Was this made in the Paleolithic Period (Old Stone Age) and then buried in the Middle Ages? Or did I not quite get this? I saw some sources that said it was Paleolithic Art. Can someone clarify for me, thanks!(3 votes)
- seeing as this is an AP art course and I know nothing about art I should probably not question this, but why do they say it looks like a feline? It doesn't look feline to me, and the article itself goes on to say that it has oryx and bovid parts.(3 votes)
- Love the article and hadn't previously known about these stones. I would never have noticed "human hind legs". To me, it just looks like an animal drawn with charcoal, perhaps not perfectly to scale. Is it generally agreed that this is a therianthrope?(3 votes)
- The article notes that "On the cleavage face of what was once a complete slab, an unidentified animal form was drawn resembling a feline in appearance but with human hind legs that were probably added later..." The article goes on to question whether..."we have some kind of supernatural creature—a therianthrope, part human and part animal?"
I wonder if what we have might be a bad artist who drew the wrong kind of legs at the rear of what he/she was trying to depict.
My reason for this goes back to a poster on a wall in Kaohsiung, Taiwan about 20 years ago. The city was in the middle of its annual "anti vermin campaign". The poster had a very real looking rat on it, and an enormous cockroach, with 6 legs on each side! That was clearly by a sign painter who hadn't checked things out before putting brush to canvas. Isn't it possible that the ancient African did something similar?(1 vote)
- It is entirely possible that this artist was just a very poor artist. We really have no way of knowing if they were or not, but based on other art from the same time period we can assume that this kind of style would not have been out of the ordinary.(5 votes)
- So according to the history of the Apollo 11 stones, the fragment image of a feline/animal on the stone is somewhat related to the history of homo sapiens/humans. Were they acting very modern, I didn't really comprehend that part about the relations between the image on the stone and humans.(2 votes)