Why in a) ii for cheese 8 was multiplied by 210 while in question we have 200?

I believe its a typo. If you look at the work review for (a)(ii) 1200+1680+2200=5000 which is incorrect since it would equal 5080. (8x200=1600) replacing the 210 with 200 in the equation shows us that it was in fact 8 x 200.

Main content

Course: AP®︎/College Macroeconomics > Unit 2

Lesson 6: Real vs. nominal GDP

Lesson summary: Real vs. nominal GDP

Google Classroom

In this lesson summary review and remind yourself of the key terms and calculations used in calculating real and nominal GDP. Topics include the distinction between real and nominal GDP and how to calculate and use the GDP deflator.

Lesson Overview

Even GDP needs to keep it real. When we calculate GDP using today’s prices, we are creating a measure called nominal GDP. However, prices can change even if output doesn’t change. Because of that, our measure of output might get distorted by something like inflation.

We account for this using real GDP, which is a measure of GDP that has been adjusted for the price level. In this way, real GDP is a truer measure of output in an economy. There are two approaches to adjusting nominal GDP to get real GDP: 1) using the same prices every year or 2) using the GDP deflator.

Key Terms

Term	Definition
nominal GDP	the market value of the final production of goods and services within a country in a given period using that year’s prices (also called “current prices”)
real GDP	nominal GDP adjusted for changes in the price level, using prices from a base year (constant prices) instead of “current prices” used in nominal GDP; real GDP adjusts the level of output for any price changes that may have occurred over time
GDP deflator	a price index used to adjust nominal GDP to find real GDP; the GDP deflator measures the average prices of all finished goods and services produced within a nation’s borders over time.
base year	the year used for comparison in the determination of price changes using the GDP deflator price index; the deflator in a base year is always equal to $= 100$ ‍.
current prices	the prices at which goods are sold in a nation in a particular year; current prices are used when calculating nominal GDP.
constant prices	the prices from a base year that are used to calculate real GDP in other years; this allows for a more accurate measure of how a country’s actual output changes over time, because using constant prices cancels out any changes in the price level between years.

Key takeaways

Definitions of nominal v. real GDP

Nominal GDP is a measure of how much is spent on output. For example, in Canada during 2015,

CAN $ 1,994.9 billion

was spent on the goods and services produced in Canada. Nominal GDP measures aggregate output (meaning the value of all of the final goods and services produced) using current prices. In other words, these figures reflect the amount spent on Canada’s output in the country’s prices in 2015.

Real GDP weighs output using prices from a base year

Real GDP is a measure of how much is actually produced. Real GDP measures aggregate output using constant prices, thus removing the effect of changes in the overall price level. For example, in 2015 the value of Canada’s output expressed in constant 2010 prices was

CAN $ 1,857 bilion

Here’s another way to think about Real GDP: if we add up all of the output that was produced in Canada during 2015 by using the prices that these goods sold for in 2010, the value of GDP in Canada is

$ 1,857 billion

. But if we add up all of the output that was produced in Canada during 2015, using the prices that they sold for in 2015, the value of GDP in Canada is

$ 1,995 billion

. This means prices must have increased between 2010 and 2015.

However, there is a slight problem with the method above. Calculating real GDP by weighting final goods and services by their prices in a base year can lead to an overstatement of real GDP growth because the prices of some goods decrease over time. Therefore, this method overstates growth in real GDP because it makes it seem like goods make up a bigger share of spending than they really do.

In other words, if the price of a good is going down (if it has gotten cheaper to produce), then using a price from long ago when it was really expensive would make it seem like a bigger deal in terms of GDP than it really is.

For example, if between 2010 and 2015 the average price of a Canadian-made hockey stick fell from

$ 100

$ 50

, and Canada produces

1 m

hockey sticks in 2010 and only

0.8 m

in 2015, the real output of hockey sticks would have appeared to have increased (since the base year price was actually higher than the current year price). In this way, weighting output using base year prices can cause a country’s GDP can be overstated.

The GDP deflator and real GDP

Another method of calculating real GDP involves converting nominal GDP to real GDP by using the GDP deflator, which tracks price changes of a nation’s output over time. Canada’s GDP deflator for its base year of 2010 was

100

since this is the year against which prices are compared. By 2015 the deflator had increased to

107.4

, indicating that the average prices of Canada’s output had increased by

7.4 %

By expressing 2015’s output in 2015 prices, therefore, Canada’s output would appear to have increased by

7.4

more than it actually did. Canada’s nominal GDP, which has been “inflated” by higher prices, can be “deflated” by dividing the country’s nominal GDP of

CAN $ 1,994 billion

by the deflator expressed in hundredths.

Canada’s real GDP can be approximated using this method.

\begin{aligned} Real GDP & = \frac{$ 1, 994 billion}{1.074} \\ = $ 1, 857 \end{aligned}

Canada's real GDP can be calculated by weighting final goods and services by their prices in a base year or by dividing nominal GDP by the GDP deflator price index in hundredths. Either method is considered valid, but the deflator method is more likely to account for price changes of particular goods produced by a nation between a base year and the current year.

Key Equations

\begin{aligned} Real GDP & = \frac{Nominal GDP}{GDP deflator (in hundredths)} \\ Nominal GDP & = Real GDP \times GDP deflator (in hundredths) \end{aligned}

Common misperceptions:

An increase in GDP does not necessarily mean a nation has produced more output; it must be specified whether the GDP in question is nominal or real. An increase in nominal GDP may just mean prices have increased, while an increase in real GDP definitely means output increased.
The GDP deflator is a price index, which means it tracks the average prices of goods and services produced across all sectors of a nation's economy over time. With this index, changes in the average price level (inflation or deflation) can be calculated between years. However, this is not the most commonly used price index for tracking inflation and deflation. The consumer price index (CPI) is the most commonly used price index, which you'll learn more about later in this course.

DIscussion questions

Why could calculating GDP each year using current prices overstate or understate changes in actual output year to year?

Why do increases in real GDP indicate an improvement in living standards, whereas increases in nominal GDP might not?

Measuring real GDP holds prices constant or adjusts the value of the nation’s output to higher or lower prices that may have prevailed from earlier years (using the GDP deflator price index). In this way the real GDP represents the actual amount of the nation’s output; which if it has increased indicates that the typical person now has more goods and services available, a result generally believed to lead to higher living standards.

The table below shows the output and the prices of Switzerland in 2017 and in 2018.

Goods produced	2017 price	2017 quantity	2018 price	2018 quantity
Chocolate	$$ 2$ ‍	$400$ ‍	$$ 3$ ‍	$400$ ‍
Cheese	$$ 6$ ‍	$200$ ‍	$$ 8$ ‍	$200$ ‍
Watches	$$ 20$ ‍	$80$ ‍	$$ 22$ ‍	$100$ ‍

a) Calculate Switzerland’s nominal GDP in (i) 2017 and (ii)2018.

b) Calculate Switzerland’s real GDP in 2018 using constant 2017 prices.

c) Calculate the GDP deflator price index for 2018. How much did the average price of goods produced in Switzerland change between 2017 and 2018?

\begin{aligned} (a)(i) 2017 nominal GDP & = ($ 2 \times 400) + ($ 6 \times 200) + ($ 20 \times 80) \\ = ($ 800) + ($ 1200) + ($ 1600) \\ = $ 3600 \\ (ii) 2018 nominal GDP & = ($ 3 \times 400) + ($ 8 \times 210) + ($ 22 \times 100) \\ = ($ 1200) + ($ 1680) + ($ 2200) \\ = $ 5000 \\ (b) real GDP 2018 & = ($ 2 \times 400) + ($ 6 \times 200) + ($ 20 \times 100) \\ = ($ 800) + ($ 1200) + ($ 2000) \\ = $ 4000 \\ (c) GDP deflator for 2018 & = \frac{{nominal GDP}_{2018}}{{real GDP}_{2018}} \times 100 \\ = \frac{$ 5000}{$ 4000} \times 100 \\ = 1.25 \times 100 \\ = 125 \\ (d) Increase in GDP deflator & = \frac{125 - 100}{100} \times 100 \\ = 125 % \end{aligned}

The average price of goods increase by

25 %

Want to join the conversation?

Sort by:

Eirian
Posted 3 years ago. Direct link to Eirian's post “I don't understand how gr...”
I don't understand how growth can be overstated in real GDP because of the method it's computed. Any help would be appreciated.

Edit: found this in the December 1995 issue of a publication by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in case anyone's experiencing the same problem:

" An extreme example illustrates this phenomenon. Consider two products: computers and the economist’s favorite, widgets. Assume that widgets are made of the same materials as computers and require the same amount of labor to assemble. In 1987, computers cost more to buy than widgets, but in 1995 one widget sells for the same price as one computer. Suppose the owner of a widget factory decides in 1995 to change production to computers by simply switching a knob. Has aggregate real output increased?
Surely not. Nothing in particular has changed, except that the boxes coming off the assembly line are now labeled “computers” rather than “widgets.”
However, BEA’s statisticians, seeing the switch in the factory’s production and applying the fixed-base-year technique, note an increase in the value of the factory’s output in 1987 dollars and decide that the switch has increased real GDP. If the change had been made in 1987, the reported increase in real output would have been reasonable because the factory switched to making what was then a more valuable product. However, registering the 1995 switch as an output gain makes little sense given that computers and widgets sell for the same price in 1995. There is no objective measure indicating that manufacturing computers in 1995 is a more productive activity than manufacturing widgets."
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(6 votes)
Answer
Child.Sky19
Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to Child.Sky19's post “Why in a) ii for cheese 8...”
Why in a) ii for cheese 8 was multiplied by 210 while in question we have 200?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(7 votes)
Answer
- Christopher
  Posted 5 years ago. Direct link to Christopher's post “I believe its a typo. If ...”
  I believe its a typo. If you look at the work review for (a)(ii) 1200+1680+2200=5000 which is incorrect since it would equal 5080. (8x200=1600) replacing the 210 with 200 in the equation shows us that it was in fact 8 x 200.
  Button navigates to signup page
  (9 votes)
Tina Mofolo
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Tina Mofolo's post “what will be France's per...”
what will be France's per capita real GDP be in 2045, given GDP of $28900 in 2003 with growth of 1.9%. Growth the same. How do you calculate?
Button navigates to signup pageComment on Tina Mofolo's post “what will be France's per...”
(3 votes)
Answer
Jhon Cedric Baltazar
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Jhon Cedric Baltazar's post “If inflation increases, w...”
If inflation increases, will real gdp decrease?
Button navigates to signup pageComment on Jhon Cedric Baltazar's post “If inflation increases, w...”
(2 votes)
Answer
e.argirova24
Posted 2 years ago. Direct link to e.argirova24's post “Suppose the amount of out...”
Suppose the amount of output doesn’t change in an economy, but the consumer price index (CPI) increases.
What happens to nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and real GDP?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(2 votes)
Answer
Victor
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Victor's post “How would you find the re...”
How would you find the real GDP of the base year?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
- Enn
  Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Enn's post “The real GDP of any year ...”
  The real GDP of any year is found by using the prices of goods and services in the base year.
  For the base year, the nominal GDP is calculated using the prices in the same year itself. So, the Real GDP is equal to the nominal GDP in the base year
  Button navigates to signup page
  (1 vote)
preytong1000
Posted an hour ago. Direct link to preytong1000's post “If inflation increases, w...”
If inflation increases, will real gdp decrease?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
Learner
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Learner's post “How to draw the Marginal ...”
How to draw the Marginal Revenue (MR) curve in the graph where MR will insect Price and then MR will intersect Quantity
Button navigates to signup pageComment on Learner's post “How to draw the Marginal ...”
(1 vote)
Answer
Marcos
Posted 4 years ago. Direct link to Marcos's post “I suppose GDP is usually ...”
I suppose GDP is usually expressed in US dollars to be able to do comparisons between countries. If that's the case, Real GDP wouldn't be the same as Nominal GDP adjusted by US inflation for that period?
Button navigates to signup pageButton navigates to signup page
(1 vote)
Answer
McCarthy, Meghan
Posted 2 years ago. Direct link to McCarthy, Meghan's post “Is the Real GDP of the ba...”
Is the Real GDP of the base year 100?
Button navigates to signup pageComment on McCarthy, Meghan's post “Is the Real GDP of the ba...”
(1 vote)
Answer