If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Present value 2

More choices as to when you get your money. Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user mybusiness.horton7
    Say I would like to see what the risk free rate is today. How can I find that out? is there a website or anything that can tell you the risk free rate today?
    (34 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • male robot hal style avatar for user John
    Why did you use a 5% interest rate? Is it some benchmark rate or was it just random?
    (7 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user hmukumu
    on the third choice, how come you did not consider the interest that the person could have earned with the 20 and 50 that were given to him. The person could have earned 5% on those two payments.
    (16 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user Iraneth
      The math works out to about the same. $20 at 5% for a year yields $21. Add the $50, and $71 at %5 yields $74.05. Add the $35, and you get $109.05, less than either of the other two options. (P.S. Thank you, Sal, for teaching me how to do that in my head while I watch your vids!)
      (39 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user k04jg02
    Why compute backwards to present value instead of computing forwards to get the final amount? Either way you want the one with the bigger result in the end it seems.
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf blue style avatar for user nrams
    Lets say i just add up $20 + $50 + $35 = $105 on the third one, then I just take the PV(105), is that possible?
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • leaf green style avatar for user Robert Sexton
    I'm missing a nuance here and maybe someone can help. For the last option it seems to me you are really comparing what you could earn on the money if you invested each yearly payment till year 2 vs. if you got it all year one and invested it for two years vs. getting a larger amount in year 2. To my mind the correct way to calculate the third option is to: 20*1.05=21, then (21+50)*1.05=74.55, then for year 2 (74.55+35)*1.05= $115.02. This is what you'd get if you invested the money yearly and it compounded, which is what you'd do in the real world. Can someone clarify?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • duskpin tree style avatar for user Dan Donnelly
    Why do we use PV to select the best deal as opposed to comparing the future value? For example if we had a choice 4 with the highest future value (FV) after two years among the choices, would we choose choice 1 with the highest PV or choice 4 with the highest FV?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • ohnoes default style avatar for user Tejas
      We normally choose the option with the highest present value. This is because we have no idea when in the future we are going to need the money. As a result, we just use present value to approximate that.
      (4 votes)
  • male robot hal style avatar for user Melinda Baker
    at , Sal divides the future payments by 1.05 to find the present value. But those values haven't been invested for that time, so it can't have accrued the 5% interest rate. So why do you have to divide by 1.05 to find the present value. wouldn't it still be the same value, since it hasn't been invested during that time?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Christopher Webb
      Present value is the value today of a payment made in the future. For example, if I am trying to sell you a municipal bond that matures in one year and bonds just like it are yielding 4.5% (assuming you are not going to get a coupon payment), then the value of that bond today (that is, what you SHOULD pay today for that bond) is $956.94. (Bonds usually have a face value of $1000). So for that payment that they are going to give you in a year, in order to make 4.5% on your money, you need to pay $956.94 for it today (and then hold it for one year at which point you get back $1,000). Make sense?
      (2 votes)
  • leaf blue style avatar for user Victor Strandmoe
    What is the term for the 1.05 at around ? I know the rate is 5% but if i were to make a sort of equation, i would do Principle/1.05. Thanks :)
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • starky ultimate style avatar for user Sudhanshu Sisodiya
    Just wondering...how would the blowing up of the financial system play out? In what ways would that affect all of us?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

Now I'll give you a slightly more complicated choice between two payment options. Both of them are good, because in either case you're getting money. So choice one. Today I will give you $100. I'll circle the payment when you get it in magenta. So today you get $100. Choice two. And I'll try to write this choice a little bit neater. Choice two is that not in 1 year, but in 2 years. So let's say this is year 1. And now this is year 2. Actually I'm going to give you three choices. That'll really hopefully hit things home. So actually let me scoot this choice two over to the left. Back to green. So now I'm back in business. So choice two, I am willing to give you, let's say, oh I don't know, $110 in 2 years. So not in 1 year. In 2 years I'm going to give you $110. And so I'll circle in magenta when you actually get your payment. And then choice three . And choice three is going to be fascinating. I've done it in a slightly different shade of green. Choice three, I am going to pay you-- I'm making this up on the fly as I go-- I'm going to pay you $20 today. I'm going to pay you $50 in 1 year. That's $70. Let me make this so it's close. And then I'm going to pay you, I don't know, $35 in year 3. So all of these are payments. I want to differentiate between the actual dollar payments and the present values. And just for the sake of simplicity, let's assume that I am guaranteed. I am the safest person available. If the world exists, if the sun does not supernova, I will be paying you this amount of money. So I'm as risk-free as the federal government. And I had a post on the previous present value, where someone talked about, well is the federal government really that safe? And this is the point. The federal government, when it borrows from you $100. Let's say it borrows $100 and it promises to pay it in a year. It'll give you that $100. The risk is, what is that $100 worth? Because they might inflate the currency to death. Anyway, I won't go into that right now. Let's just go back to this present value problem. And actually sometimes governments do default on debt. But the U.S. government has never defaulted. It has inflated its currency. So that's kind of a round about way of defaulting. But its never actually said, I will not pay you. Because if that happened, our entire financial system would blow up and we would all be living off the land again. Anyway, back to this problem. Enough commentary from Sal. So let's just compare choice one and choice two again. And once again let's say that risk-free, I could put money, I could lend it to the federal government at 5%. Risk-free rate is 5%. And for the sake of simplicity-- in the next video I will make that assumption less simple-- but for the sake simplicity, the government will pay you 5% whether you give them the money for 1 year, whether you give them the money for 2 years, or whether you give them the money for 3 years, right? So if I had $100, what would that be worth in 1 year? We figured that out already. It's 100 times 1.05. So that's $105. And then if you got another 5%? So the government is giving you 5% per year. It would be 105 times 1.05. And what is that? So I have 105 times 1.05, which equals $110.25. So that is the value in 2 years. So immediately, without even doing any present value, we see that you'll actually be better off in 2 years if you were to take the money now and just lend it to the government. Because the government, risk-free, will give you $110.25 in 2 years, while I'm only willing to give you $110. So that's all fair and good. But the whole topic, what we're trying to solve, is present value. So let's take everything in today's money. And to take this $110 and say what is that worth today, we can just discount it backwards by the same method, right? So $110 in 2 years, what is its 1-year value? Well, you take $110 and you divide it by 1.05. You're just doing the reverse. And then you get some number here. Well that number you get is 110 divided by 1.05. And then to get its present value, its value today, you divide that by 1.05 again. So you get 110 divided. If I were to divide by 1.05 again what do I get? I divide by 1.05, and then I divide by 1.05 again. I'm dividing by 1.05 squared. And what does that equal? And I'm writing this on purpose, because I want to get you used to this notation. Because this is what all of our present values and our discounted cash flow, this type of dividing by 1 plus the discount rate to the power of however many years out, this is what all of that's based on. And that's all we're doing though, we're just dividing by 1.05 twice because we're 2 years out. So let's do that. 110 divided by 1.05 squared is equal to $99.77. So once again we have verified, by taking the present value of $110 in 2 years to today, that its present value-- if we assume a 5% discount rate. And this discount rate, this is where all of the fudge factor occurs in finance. You can tweak that discount rate and make a few assumptions in discount rate and pretty much assume anything. But right now, for simplification, we're assuming a risk-free discount rate. But when the present value is based on that, you get $99.77. You say, wow, yeah, this really isn't as good as this. I would rather have $100 today than $99.77 today. Now this is interesting. Choice number three. How do we look at this? Well what we do is, we present value each of the payments, right? So the present value of $20 today, well that's just $20. What's the present value of $50 in 1 year? Well the present value of that is going to be-- so plus $50 divided by 1.05, right-- that's the present value of the $50, because it's 1 year out. And then I want the present value of the $35. So that's plus $35 divided by what-- it's 2 years out, right, so you have to discount it twice-- divided by 1.05 squared. Just like we did here. So let's figure out what that present value is. Notice I'm just adding up the present values of each of those payments. Get out my virtual TI-85. Let's see, so the present value of the $20 payment is $20, plus the present value of the $50 payment. Well that's just 50 divided by 1.05, plus the present value of our $35 payment. 35 divided by-- and it's 2 years out, so we discount by our discount rate twice-- so it's divided by 1.05 squared. And then that is equal to-- we'll round it-- $99.37. So now we can make a very good comparison between the three options. This might have been confusing before. You know, you have this guy coming up to you. And this guy is usually in the form of some type of retirement plan or insurance company, where they say, hey, you pay me this for years a, b, and c, and I'll pay you that in years b, c, and d. And you're like, boy, how do I compare if that's really a good value? Well this is how you compare it. You present value all of the payments and you say well what is that worth to me today. And here we did that. We said well actually choice number one is the best deal. And it just depended on how the mathematics work out. If I lowered the discount rate, if this discount rate is lower, it might have changed the outcomes. And maybe I'll actually do that in the next video, just to show you how important the discount rate is. Anyway I'm out of time, and I'll see you in the next video.