If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Present value 3

What happens when we change the discount rate? Created by Sal Khan.

Want to join the conversation?

  • blobby green style avatar for user mybusiness.horton7
    So basically banks control money value by the rate they give right?
    (3 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user SirEdwinDrake
      Money value is controlled by the amount of bills that are in circulation. If there is 100 bills in circulation and the economy produces 1000 goods then each bill will purchase 1/10 of total economic output. If there are 1000 bills in circulation and the economy produces 1000 goods then each bill will purchase 1/1000 of total economic output. Therefore in the first case each bill is more valuable. The gov controls the money supply in a few ways: by changing the amount of bills banks are legally required to hold in their reserve accounts, by buying or selling securities in the open market, or by changing federal discount rate. So the rate is ONE way of changing money value, but only the federal rate, and only the fed (federal reserve bank) can alter this rate.
      (8 votes)
  • blobby green style avatar for user Chris Morgan
    Ok, question on bonds, you have my head spinning...If a bond is paying 6.75% and the interest rate drops to say 1 or 2% yet that bond is still paying 6.75%. Than the value of that bond is going up correct? Will this hurt or help a municipality, and does it help or hurt the investor...This is rattling around my brain housing group now....it is like I got hit with a knowledge lightning bolt......thanks
    (5 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • leaf green style avatar for user Ryan
      Yes, the price of the bond will go up. Falling interest rates mean the market is demanding less than what the bond is paying.

      If the bond has a fixed coupon, the corporation, or government that issued the bond will always pay the same amount. If the above bond has a $1000 par value, the coupon payment will still be $67.50 per year, regardless of what happens to the price and interest rates. There are some accounting metrics that may hurt or help the issuer, but they are beyond the scope of these videos.

      As for the investor, if the price goes up the investor could sell at a profit if he doesn't want to hold the bond until maturity.
      (3 votes)
  • leafers sapling style avatar for user Jay
    Is present value always determined using a "risk-free" rate?
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user Michael
      No. You can use any rate that you could obtain. For instance a term deposit with your local bank may have a slightly higher return than the risk free rate. You can use that term deposit rate to discount the cash flows back to calculate PV. In other words any rate that you can invest in can be used, not just the risk free rate.
      (3 votes)
  • piceratops ultimate style avatar for user VanossGaming
    I'm an Australian and I'm 12 so I don't know what a treasury bond is. Can someone please help me. I thank you in advance for helping me.
    (4 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user p.kravanja
    So, in generally, a lower interest rate makes investments (=money in the future, when the investment pays off) more attractive? The low interest rates we are having now are incentives for the companies to invest, right?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Jaweria Ali
    What are three values that is dependent on Present Value?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • female robot ada style avatar for user fab.ring
      The Present Value depends on the number of years (Y), the risk free interest rate (r) and the amount (a) you are looking at.

      For example: 2 years from now you get $110. This is worth today $99.77 if you assume a 5% risk free interest rate.
      Y = 2
      r = 0.05 or 5%
      a = $110 or $99.77 - depending on the direction you are looking at the PV
      (2 votes)
  • female robot grace style avatar for user Shaymaa Bohas
    first, i would like to thank you for all your effort. i have a question if the Risk Rate is minus ( 5%) for example , what it will be the explanation for that?
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
    • blobby green style avatar for user Michael
      Why would any rate be negative: That means that you owe them money before you've invested your money with them... A negative rate will give you larger PV than the FV. In other words they pay you less than you originally paid them. No logical investor would agree to a negative rate.

      On top of the rational investor explanation, all investments carry risk, therefore should all offer a positive return.
      (2 votes)
  • spunky sam blue style avatar for user Accmohamed Elzoghby
    Why he divided the amount of money or ( future value ) only on the risk free rate ?? Why he don't take the inflation in your account?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user Moses Latjor Tut
    secondly, I would like to know the difference between interest rates and discounting.
    (2 votes)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user
  • blobby green style avatar for user GoNavy31
    At 3.57, Sal says that it is important to keep in mind that the PV increased with a decrease in the interest rate, and he mentions bonds. In regards to bonds, why wouldn't a lower interest rate decrease the price of the bond? Wouldn't there be less demand for a lower interest rate?
    (1 vote)
    Default Khan Academy avatar avatar for user

Video transcript

In the last video, we figured out what is the present value of these three different payment timing choices. If we had a 5% risk-free rate, and if these payments were risk-free, instead of coming from -- you can almost view them as some type of government program, where they're asking you to choose which of these three payment streams from the government do you want? And so we'll use the same rate that the government would pay you, if you lent them money. And that's given by the treasury rate. And in the first case we assumed a 5% treasury rate. And if you watched the first present value video, I think you understand why compounding going forward is the same thing as discounting that rate by going backwards. If you want to know how much $100 is a year from now, you multiply that times one plus the interest rate, right? So if it's 5%, you multiply that times 1.05. If you're taking $110 and going a year back, you divide by 1.05. So it's just the same operation. You're just going forward or back. Forward is multiplication, backwards is division. But anyway, the result that we got in the last video is that the present value -- let me do this in a different color. And I'll introduce my notation. The present value, if we assume a 5% rate, no matter how long-- how far away the money is given to you. And you'll see what I mean because I'll change that assumption in a second. But if we assume that the risk-free rate is 5%, then the present value of $100 today, well that was just $100. $110 in two years, we got that by doing 110 divided by 1.05 squared, right? You divide by 1.05 there, and then you divide by 1.05 again. And then you get $99.77. I don't want to run out of too much space. I could have probably done this whole thing a little bit bigger. And then choice number three. How did we get that? Well, we said -- let me do that in a different color. That was the present value of the $20 today, plus $50 in one year, divided by that, discounted to the present day. So divided by 1.05 plus $35 divided by 1.05 squared. And we had gotten $99.36. And that's what that should be worth to you today, if you assume that these payments are risk-free, and you use a 5% discount rate. Fair enough. And based on these calculations, choice number one was the best, choice number two was second best, choice number three was third best. Fair enough. Now what happens -- after I pose the question, you might want to think about it before I show you the answer -- what happens if I don't assume a 5% discount rate? What happens if I assume a 2% discount rate? This is just my notation. What is the present value of these if I assume a 2% risk-free rate, or a 2% discount rate? Well $100, I'm getting that today, so that's still worth $100. You could even do that as -- let me do that in a more vibrant color -- as 100 divided by 1.02 to the 0 power, because we're getting it today. But that's just 1.02 divided by 1, which is just $100. $100 today. What's the present value? It's $100. Now what's the $110 two years out going to be worth? So this is interesting. When the interest rate goes down, from 5% to 2%, I'm going to be dividing by a smaller number. 1.02 squared is a smaller number than 1.05 squared. So the present value of this payment should go up. Interesting. This is something to keep in mind for later, when we start thinking about bonds. When you lower the interest rate, the present value of this future payment goes up. And it just falls out of the math. You're discounting by a smaller number. Let's figure out what that is. So if I take $110 and I divide it by 1.02 squared, right? Discounted twice. I get $105.72. Oh, and how did I get that? That was equal to -- I'm doing it in reverse here -- that was equal to 110 divided by 1.02 squared. And our intuition was correct. Just by the interest rate going from 5% to 2%, the present value of this payment two years out -- it's in year three, but it's two years out. Actually I should re-label this. I should call this now, the present. I should call this year one. I was calling this year two, one year out. But I think that makes it confusing. I called this year two, so this is now. So you could call this year zero. This is year one. And this is year two. Anyway. The present value of this is -- it increased by $6 just by the discount rate going down by 3%. Fascinating. Now let's see what happens to choice number three. Choice number three, the $20 today, the $20 now, well that's just worth $20. Its present value is 20 plus 50 divided by 1.02, plus the 35 divided by 1.02 squared. Let's see what this adds up. 20 plus 50 divided by 1.02 plus 35 divided by 1.02 squared. $102.66. Now there's a couple of really interesting things. And this is a really good time to kind of let it all sink in. All of a sudden we lowered the interest rate. And now choice number two is the best, followed by choice number three, followed by choice number one. So it almost -- choice number one was the best when we had a 5% discount rate. Now at a 2% discount rate, choice number two is all of a sudden the best. And there's something else interesting here. Choice number two improved by a lot more when we lowered the interest rate, than choice number three did. Its present value went from $99.77 to $105.70, so it's almost $6. While here it only improved by less than $3, right? So why is that? Well, when you lower the interest rate, the terms that are using that discount rate the most, benefit the most. So all of this payment was two years out, right? So it benefited the most by decreasing the discount rate, the 1.02 squared. It changed this value the most. These payments are spread out. Only some of its payment is two years out. Then some of its payment is one year out, and that's going to benefit less. And then some of its payment is today. So it will benefit, because you are discounting some of the cash payments. But it's going to benefit by less. Anyway, I'll leave you there in this video. And in the next video, we're going to see what happens when we have different discount rates for different amounts of time. See you in the next video.