If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content
Current time:0:00Total duration:5:16
AP.MACRO:
POL‑1 (EU)
,
POL‑1.C (LO)
,
POL‑1.C.1 (EK)
,
POL‑1.C.2 (EK)
,
POL‑1.C.3 (EK)
,
POL‑1.C.4 (EK)

Video transcript

so what we have depicted this diagram is the business cycle that we have looked at in other videos this horizontal axis is time vertical axis is real GDP what we see in this dark blue color you can view that as full employment output at different points in time and you can see that it is growing so this economy is experiencing economic growth maybe its population is increasing they're getting more productive maybe with better education or with better technology but we know that real economies don't just have this nice clean economic growth they tend to cycle around their full employment output that times when they're above the trend line like right over here you have a positive output gap so this is a positive output gap at that point right over there and you can also have negative output gaps we also talked in other videos about fiscal policy these are the tools that governments might use in order to close these output gaps for example when you have a positive output gap a government might be afraid that things are overheating maybe they're afraid of inflation they might have contractionary fiscal policy they might try to do something for that moment in time to bring to close that gap a little bit more likely when there is a negative output gap and people are out of work the government say hey I want let's let's pass a stimulus package explicitly to try to close this gap let's lower taxes let's increase government spending that type of fiscal policy where the government is doing something special for that circumstance in order to close that output gap that is discretionary discretionary fiscal policies that the discretion of the government to do it but we're going to focus on in this video our automatic stabilizers these are things that people don't have to take special action based on the circumstances in order for them to help smooth out the business cycle so automatic stabilizers so what are examples of automatic stabilizers so one common one is taxes so pause this video for a second and think about how do taxes help smooth out these fluctuations so let's think about what's happening at a part of the business cycle where the economy is expanding let's say right over there or let's say right over here what would be happening with taxes well in these realities with this positive output gap you could imagine four people's incomes are going to get higher and higher corporate profits are going to be more and more and so our change in taxes is going to be positive and not only is it going to be positive not only your tax is going to increase in absolute dollar terms but they're probably going to grow at a faster rate than the economy why is that when the economy turns positive when you start expanding more more and more corporations are going to become profitable if you think about personal income taxes below certain incomes in a lot of countries you don't even have to pay income taxes and that for every incremental dollar or every incremental $10,000 the tax rate on that incremental chunk could go up and so that's why the absolute dollar amount of taxes will likely increase as a faster rate than the actual economic growth and let's think about the other scenario let's think about what taxes do when we are in a recession so let's say we pick that place right over there well in this situation corporate profits are going to be lower in fact some corporation is going to come unprofitable in which case they wouldn't pay corporate taxes people are gonna make less and less money so your change in taxes here is going to be likely to be negative and once again your rate of decrease in taxes is likely to be greater than your great in decrease of real GDP the tax multiplier is negative and so it might smooth out the curve a little bit now another example of an automatic stabilizer would be things like welfare payments or unemployment insurance why would these be automatic stabilizers well when times are good when you have this positive output gap fewer and fewer people are going to need welfare or need they're going to need unemployment payments and so in that world that is like a decrease in government spending the government's not going to have to pay for these benefits and so decrease in government spending that's contractionary and so that will help smooth out the curve a little bit and once again when we have are when we when we go to our recession and then when we started having our negative output gaps more people are going to be on welfare more people are going to need their unemployment benefits and so that's going to increase government spending which might with them with the multiplier smooth out this curve a little bit and so the big takeaway is is when the government does something explicitly for the time that they are in in order to smooth out the curve that's discretionary fiscal policy but you might have things in the system the existing tax policy existing laws around welfare or unemployment insurance or other benefits that might have an effect of regardless of where we are on the business cycle they are a damp to have a dampening effect they try to they would smooth out these oscillations a little more they would be automatic stabilizers
AP® is a registered trademark of the College Board, which has not reviewed this resource.