Main content
AP®︎/College Macroeconomics
Course: AP®︎/College Macroeconomics > Unit 5
Lesson 4: Crowding outCrowding out
How government borrowing could have negative effects on investment and economic growth by "crowding out" private borrowers/investors in the loanable funds market.
Want to join the conversation?
- Why does an increase in government borrowing lead to an increase in the demand for loanable funds?(4 votes)
- It's simply that there are more borrowers. Compare 2 people borrowing money and 10 people borrowing money. With additional borrowers, demand for loanable funds increase. Government is just an additional borrower.(2 votes)
- We can see that increased govt. borrowing (& therefore investment) is offset by a fall in private sector borrowing & investment...
Why is it thought of as favourable for the private sector to be responsible for the majority of investment?(2 votes)- Because the private sector invests to generate capital, which generates supply, which contributes to output. Public sector spending, on the other hand, drives up interest rates without the private sector having the ability to support itself and increase economic output. Hope this helps :)(1 vote)
- I take it the government would be borrowing in order to spend. Wouldn't that spending offset the spending firms are no longer doing somewhat?(1 vote)
- The government may borrow money and spend to make up for firms in the economy spending less. However, the issue is that the increased government borrowing results in a rise in the interest rates. This rise in interest rates will result in firms to further cut spending, that might offset the government's effort to increase aggregate demand.(2 votes)
- I thought government borrowed money from the central banks via selling bonds to the fed, instead from the loanable funds market.. was i wrong?(1 vote)
- The commercial banks borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank (the United State's central bank). The government, to increase AD in a recession, increases spending (borrowing) in the loanable funds market, which both 1) increases deficit spending and therefore increasing the national debt and 2) may have more repercussions than benefits, by crowding out the public sector as Sal explained. Hope this helped :)(1 vote)
Video transcript
- [Instructor] In this
video we're gonna use a simple model for the
loanable funds market to understand a phenomenon
known as crowding out. And this is making reference to when a government borrows money, to some degree it could crowd out private sector borrowing and investment, and it could have negative
consequences for the economy. You might have less
investment as a result, and you could have less economic growth. So let's see how the
crowding out can happen using this loanable funds market. So, just to be clear what's going on here, horizontal axis, the
quantity of loanable funds. The vertical axis, you have
your price of borrowing, which is going to be
our real interest rate. And our equilibrium real
interest rate and quantity is determined by the intersection between the supply of loanable funds curve and the demands of loanable funds curve. So what happens if,
let's just say step one, the government decides to borrow to fund some of its spending. What is going to happen to these curves? Is one of them going to shift? Well, sure. If at any given interest rate, all of a sudden you have a big borrower in terms of the government
that now wants to enter the market for loanable funds, at a given interest rate, that's going to increase the
demand for loanable funds. So the step one right over here is going to shift the demand
of loanable funds curve to the right, I'll just that
step one right over there. And so our new demand for loanable funds might look something like this. And so let's call this demand
for loanable funds prime. So this is going to shift, shift the demand for
loanable funds to the right. Now, what does that going to cause? Well that is going to cause our
real interest rate to go up. Real interest, interest rate is going to go up. You see it right over here. Our new equilibrium, you
do have more loanable funds that are being supplied and demanded, that are being borrowed. So this call this Q prime. But you see this happening
at a higher cost, at a higher real interest rate. So we call that R prime. Well, what's going to be the
impact in the private sector of a higher real interest rate? Let's imagine for a second this first blue curve was
just the private sector. Let's say that the government
just started to borrow in this video shifting the curve. Well, if the blue curve was
just the private sector, at this new interest rate,
the private sector is willing to borrow a lot less. So we could say, private sector, private sector borrows less, borrows less. And so what could that result in? Well, then, you could have, and this is the negative
effects of crowding out, you could have, because
they're borrowing less, they're fueling less investment, then you're gonna have less capital, less productive capital that you can use to produce things, so we could say, less capital accumulation, accumulation. Which is just another way
of saying, for example, people are investing less, because they're not borrowing as much. Investing less in factory
or some other thing that might make people, or in technology, things that might make
them more productive. And so if you're having
less capital accumulation, that means that you're going
to have slower economic growth. One of the ways that a
country really pushes its production possibilities curve out or really pushes its long
run aggregate supply curve to the right and has true economic growth is through investment. But if you have, if you're
borrowing costs are higher, you're gonna have less investment, less capital accumulation
and slower economic growth.