Main content
Course: Special topics in art history > Unit 2
Lesson 5: Painting conservation- Conservation of paintings
- Conservation: portrait miniatures
- Ghent Altarpiece project overview
- Conserving a portrait of King Edward VI
- Jan Gossart - Conservation Discoveries
- Conserving Velázquez's Portrait of Philip IV
- Conserving van Walscapelle's Flowers in a Glass Vase
- Conserving Everhard Jabach and His Family
- Conserving the Virgin of Guadalupe
- Conserving Vincent van Gogh's Field with Irises near Arles
- Conserving Van Gogh's "Enclosed Field with Ploughman" Under Raking Light
- The Science of Van Gogh's Bedrooms
- Restoring Rothko
- Conserving Cuzco School Paintings
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Conservation of paintings
Artists, like composers, assemble various materials to create their masterpieces. Restorers help preserve these works, often revealing hidden layers with tools like infrared reflectography. Paintings carry histories, from their creation to their restoration. Artists' genius lies in their ability to express complex emotions and ideas through the unruly medium of paint. Created by Getty Museum.
Want to join the conversation?
- Was the arm fully painted underneath the clothing, or was it merely a sketch? If so, what is the advantage of painting the arm underneath?(7 votes)
- According to the conservator, it was "blocked in", meaning it was painted, but not to a fine detail. There are a couple reasons for this. First of all, it improves anatomical accuracy to construct a complete figure. You don't have to worry about the arm being in the wrong place, or just looking wrong. Second, it gives you more options. Artists often change their minds about a piece as they paint. Here, David could choose not to cover the man's shoulder, to paint a semi-transparent material, or simply to change the shape of the cloth, and not have to worry about repainting the arm to make it fit.(9 votes)
- When the artist blocked in the arm and then painted the cloth over it, was it just in that spot or was it the same with the female figure as well?(2 votes)
- I'm not certain, but he probably did block in both figures. Most likely the video showed the arm as an example of a common practice, not as the only instance.(2 votes)
- Do people donate art to you? Please tell me how you get your art.(0 votes)
- They can get their art in many ways, it does get donated, or as mentioned in the video, it is bought at auctions, and there are other ways as well.(1 vote)
- im an artist to i want to know how do u art ?(0 votes)
Video transcript
In many ways, the
artist's materials are what musical notes
are for a composer. The artist brings together a
disparate group of materials, assembles them
into a composition, and what we see of that
composition is on the canvas. In just the same way
that a conductor's job is to take this set
of notes and make some sense of the
unruly orchestra, a restorer's job is to take
this set of materials which has gone through a
lot of transformations since it was applied
by the artist and make some sense of it. As consumers, we have
a variety of tools that have been
adapted to give us clues about what the
artist may have had in mind when he was creating
a particular image. This is "The Farewell of
Telemachus and Eucharis," which was painted by
Jacques-Louis David in 1818 when he was working
in exile in Brussels. We're looking at a
detail of the painting with a technique called
infrared reflectography, which involves taking a camera
that has been equipped with an infrared-sensitive
tube and seeing the reflective abilities of different
materials, different pigments in the infrared light range. If we take a close look at
this area of the painting, when we look at it with
infrared, what we see is that David went
to the trouble to block in the figure in the
nude underneath the drapery and then to
literally clothe him. David was trained as
an academic painter. Academic painters in France were
trained from a very young age to draw and study the nude. And one of the
reasons you do that is so that you can get
a real sense of form, not just the surface of
the skin, but the bone and the muscle
that's underneath. When you walk through
the galleries, there are a couple of things
that you're not aware of. One is the fact that the
picture has a history. It has a history
from the time that it left the easel, when
all sorts of things began to happen to it. This is a painting by an early
19th century German painter named Caspar David
Friedrich, who is an extremely rare
artist in this country. When I first saw the painting
at the auction house, it was in a somewhat
disheveled state. It had a fairly discolored
varnish on the surface, and more importantly,
it had a large hole in this part of the painting. What I did do was to repair
the hole from the back, glue some new pieces
of fabric just to the edges of
the painting, which allowed me to re-stretch
it onto the stretcher. And then I had
prepared the stretcher with yet another
piece of fabric. And then the whole
package was put back together so that from
the front you really can't tell that
anything has happened. So, the challenge
in the restoration was to take care of the
structural anomalies, this hole in the sky, but to do
the work in such a way that my presence would be
as invisible as possible so that all that
was left in the end was the artist's voice
speaking to you directly. We have been able to
look at this painting with infrared reflectography,
and underneath the surface there's an extraordinarily
elaborate plan. These trees in the
distance, which have a kind of
misty quality, were laid in in very
elaborate, precise detail. And then the paint actually
played the role of the mist. Imagine a late afternoon
or early evening when the mist begins to
rise from the fields. Friedrich literally
laid in the mist, laid in the paint the same
way that the mist would have traveled into the field. And that's one of the
reasons that this illusion of a tree in the mist
in the distance compared to the clarity of the
tree in the foreground is so successful because
he's used the paint almost to imitate the natural
progression of the atmosphere. What appears to be the essence
of simplicity and purity is often the result of a
tremendous wrestle and struggle with materials. Paint is a very unruly and
difficult substance to handle, and it's very hard to make
it do what you want it to do. And one of the reasons that
artists are such geniuses is because they're able to
take a virtually unmanageable material and make sense
of it, make it speak, make it say something and
reflect some inner beliefs and feelings that they have. And that's a tremendous
skill and talent and gift, which is why we appreciate
these things today.